We have a Printer, Scanner and Label Maker to get your business organised. Enter today.
Fitbit Ionic review: Impressive but not quite iconic
- Battery Life
- Great software
- On-board music is annoying to setup
- Inconsistent performance
The Fitbit Ionic isn’t quite the slam dunk product that maybe the brand’s fanatics might have hoped it would be. However, it still manages makes a strong case that - despite their wearable roots - Fitbit absolutely have what it takes to compete with the big names in the smartwatch space.
Price$ 449.00 (AUD)
There’s a lot of hype behind (and hope riding atop) Fitbit’s first true smartwatch. The Fitbit Ionic isn’t just the company’s first fully-featured effort in the smartwatch space, it’s the centerpiece of their pivot into the broader tech space. The wearables market - while still strong, has slowed in recent years - and it's evolve-or-die time for companies like Fitbit.
The days of Fitbit being solely focused on the trackers that they made their brand on are fast fading into the rear-view mirror. Now, the company is moving to sell not just fitness trackers but a whole ecosystem of products that compliment one another.
The crux of this effort: The Fitbit Ionic. Thankfully for the company, the finished product here represents both a strong first step for the company and an equally-impressive evolution over last year’s Fitbit Blaze.
It’s good where it needs to be - even if it's got enough quirks to stop it from being an outright must-have.
The Fitbit Ionic is a GPS Sport watch running on Fitbit’s own FitbitOS operating system. It features a 1.42-inch (348 x 250 pixels) LCD display that comes coated in Gorilla Glass 3.
Under the hood, it’s packing a 3-axis accelerometer, 3-axis gyroscope, optical heart rate monitor, altimeter, ambient light sensor, GPS and a lithium-polymer battery that promises (and mostly delivers) 5 days of life to a single charge .
The Fitbit Ionic also comes water resistant to fifty meters and is available in Charcoal/Smoke Gray, Slate Blue/Burnt Orange, Blue Gray/Silver Gray color variants.
At a glance, the most-immediate difference here between the Ionic and the competition is that the Ionic doesn’t just lean into Fitbit’s past aesthetic efforts but has clearly learned a lot from them.
As you’d expect, it sits closer to the fitness bands that Fitbit are known for than it does the more traditional watch designs that Samsung and Huawei have dabbled with in recent years. In comparison to the new Series 3 Apple Watch, the Ionic looks noticeably sharper in the most literal sense. Where Apple’s timepiece is all curved corners and rounded-edges, the Iconic touts sleek slopes and acute angles.
Still, at a glance, it’s clear that this wearable is absolutely building on the foundation set by last year’s Fitbit Blaze. That said, it’s equally apparent that a lot of lessons have been learned by Fitbit’s design team in between the two releases. The Ionic is nowhere near as bulky in form-factor and generally much lighter on your wrist.
There’s no sort of always-on display - which would have made for a nice addition. In it’s place, the Ionic boasts a degree of wrist-detection that (sometimes) turns on the display when it sense you tilting it towards your face. Again, this was pretty inconsistent.
In terms of control, the majority of the functions of the Ionic are accessed by swiping or tapping on the unit’s touch screen. This is about as easy as said as done. For everything else, the three stubby buttons on the sides of the Ionic are used as shortcuts. Again, these do their job without too much fuss.
Unfortunately, the limited refresh rate and resolution on the display can make navigating menus feel stuttery and jagged even at its best. While the software powering those menus is much cleaner than that of the Blaze, this definitely feels like one area where the Ionic comes second place to its predecessor.
Next: Software, Performance, Battery Life and The Bottom Line
Join the newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Nokia 6 (2018) review: Simple. Solid. Supreme.
- 2 Samsung Q9F Series QLED: Peak performance from a home entertainment heavyweight
- 3 Hisense takes the fight to home entertainment heavyweights with flagship Series 8 and 9 ULED TVs
- 4 D-Link Omna 180 Cam HD DSH-C310 review
- 5 Ring Video Doorbell review
Latest News Articles
- Suunto 9 promises 120 hours of battery life
- Fitbit ship one million Versa smartwatches in two months
- WWDC 2018: watchOS 5 adds walkie-talkie mode and more
- Computex 2018: ASUS debut world’s first blood-pressure tracking smartwatch
- Huawei gear up to refresh smartwatch offering with eSim
PCW Evaluation Team
I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.
If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.
If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.
Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category
The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use
I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.
- Sonos Beam review: A more-affordable, smarter soundbar option
- Oppo R15 Pro review: A compelling mid-tier option with lots of value and few compromises
- ASUS Zenbook Pro 15: A futuristic, exciting, imperfect, flagship notebook
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies