Well, that didn’t take long. A few short weeks after reviewing the Samsung T7, SanDisk’s Extreme Portable Pro SSD (1TB) showed up at our door and easily surpassed its rival for the top-performing USB 3.1 Gen 2 drive. SanDisk’s drive doesn’t offer the T7’s handy and fun fingerprint security, but it’s about the same price and offers software-based password protection if security is a concern.
This review is part of our ongoing roundup of the best external drives. Go there for information on competing products and how we tested them.
Design and features
The Extreme Pro Portable SSD is a bit larger than the previous iteration, measuring approximately 0.4 x 2.25 x 4.34 inches, but it’s still compact enough to reside comfortably in a shirt pocket. Unlike the Samsung T7 competition, there’s an attachment point (a very large one!) for a lanyard or key ring.
The Extreme Pro Portable is designed with an aluminum chassis and ABS top, and is IP55-rated (Ingress Protection), meaning it will fend off dust and low-pressure water. The ingress weak spot with storage devices has historically been the connection port, but Type-C ports, such as the one on the Extreme Pro, are far better sealed than previous types.
Note that the IP rating indicates survivability when disconnected. With electricity flowing through a cable connection, fluid can short cable pins, causing electronic damage.
The Extreme Pro Portable SSD lacks the fingerprint reader that graces the Samsung T7; however, it does come with SanDisk’s own SecureAccess software security solution. It provides password protection for the drive’s 256-bit AES encryption (when enabled), though it must, of course, be installed on any device or PC from which you wish to access your data—not as convenient. Neither drive is FIPS 140-2 certified (Federal Information Processing Standards security), which will limit enterprise interest and rule it out for conforming government agencies.
Why is the Extreme Pro Portable so fast? While it does transfer data via speedy USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 gigabits per second), it's likely far more important that the internal storage uses the NVMe communications standard, instead of the slower SATA standard used by its Extreme Portable SSD predecessor. Beyond that, SanDisk offered no details, and I didn’t want to destroy the drive to find out what’s inside.
The WD store (SanDisk’s parent company) sells the Extreme Pro Portable in three sizes: 500GB for $120 currently, 1TB for $230 currently (the size we tested), and 2TB for $430 currently. We found the same prices on major online sites: 500GB for $120 on Amazon and 1TB for $230 on Amazon. The five-year warranty is in effect no matter where you buy.
SanDisk squeezed a lot more performance across the board from the Pro version, so much so that it’s the fastest USB SSD that we’ve see to date. Burst performance is roughly on a par with the Samsung T7’s, but it blows that drive out of the water during long writes. All the results shown below are from the 1TB version SanDisk sent us.
CrystalDiskMark 6 rated the Extreme Pro, Samsung T5, and Samsung T7 drives nearly equal, but as I just noted, real-world testing revealed a distinct advantage for the Extreme Pro during long writes. In the 48GB write tests shown below, this sway was apparent...
Those are eye-opening results, however, check out the 450GB write numbers below, where the advantage became overwhelming.
The primary reason for the landslide victory was that the Extreme Pro Portable wrote at a relatively steady 600MBps or so, while the T7 started at over 500MBps and dropped to around 300MBps when it ran out of cache. That occurred at around 4 percent of total capacity, or the 20GB mark with the 500GB T7 we tested. More capacious models of the T7 will run out of cache later in the process, narrowing but not eliminating the margin of defeat.
The Samsung T7 is a slightly faster reader, but being a distant second writing really hurt its conglomerate score in the 48GB tests. How much the slow writing will affect you depends on how you use your drive. For small amounts of data, the difference won’t tell. However, the time you’ll save on writes with the Extreme Pro Portable will tell over the long haul.
Testing is performed on Windows 10, 64-bit running on a Core i7-5820K/Asus X99 Deluxe system with four 16GB Kingston 2666MHz DDR4 modules, a Zotac (NVidia) GT 710 1GB x2 PCIe graphics card, and an Asmedia ASM2142 USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10Gbps) card. Also on board are a Gigabyte GC-Alpine Thunderbolt 3 card and Softperfect’s Ramdisk 3.4.6, which is used for the 48GB read and write tests.
It’s the winner
The Sandisk Extreme Pro Portable SSD is faster and only a bit larger that the Samsung T7. I admit that I enjoy the Samsung T7’s fingerprint swiper, but otherwise, the Sandisk Extreme Portable Pro is the portable USB SSD you want when you’re dealing with large amounts of data.