How a mobile app company found the XcodeGhost in the machine

Apple will facing increasingly clever attempts to sneak malware into the App Store

Nick Arnott couldn't figure out recently why Apple kept rejecting an update to a mobile app his company developed.

It turned out the problem was a ghost in the machine.

His company, Possible Mobile, is well versed in the App Store submission rules and has built apps for JetBlue, Better Homes & Gardens and the Major League Soccer.

The rejection came after it was discovered in mid-September that thousands of apps in the App Store had been built with a counterfeit version of an Apple development tool, Xcode.

The fake version, dubbed XcodeGhost and probably developed in China, had been downloaded by many developers from third-party sources, apparently because getting the 4GB code from Apple took too long.

apples xcode development tool Screenshot/Apple

Apple's Xcode tool is used for building applications for the company's devices.

Security researchers found that apps with XcodeGhost posed a privacy risk, as the apps could easily be configured to record data from people's devices and send it to a remote server.

The entry of more than 4,000 XcodeGhost-infected apps into the App Store marked one of the most successful breaches of Apple's stringent security checks, threatening to undermine the company's years-long efforts to keep the store free of malware.

After its app was rejected, Possible Mobile set out to find out why and detailed its efforts in a blog post.

Apple had indicated it had something to do with XcodeGhost. But Arnott and his team were stumped: The version of Xcode they were using was the legitimate one. They reinstalled fresh versions of Xcode on several machines, but Apple still rejected the app.

Making a mobile app is a bit like making sausage: A lot of code frameworks and libraries developed by other companies are used for functions like ad serving and video delivery.

Those frameworks often come as binaries, and developers have no visibility into what is actually in the source code, said Jay Graves, Possible Mobile's CTO, in a phone interview.

"Any of the top apps from top brands on the App Store are going to have something from a third party," Graves said.

Trying to figure out what is in a binary is what security researchers do, not app developers, Graves said. After scratching their heads, they guessed that the problem was probably in a third-party framework.

The framework had been compiled with a tainted Xcode version, and that code was subsequently incorporated into the app by Possible Mobile. After being alerted, the company that developed the framework fixed the problem and delivered a clean version, Graves said.

Apple can now detect apps infected with XcodeGhost. But there's already an improved version of XcodeGhost that tries to make it harder to analyze and detect.

"Every once in a while, you hear about something getting into the App Store that isn't supposed to be there," Arnott said. "But there's kind of an endless list of tricks that malicious developers can use to try to get this stuff past Apple's review process."

To figure out if the third-party framework was the culprit, Possible Mobile had used a command-line tool, grep, to find the URLs that XcodeGhost was programmed to contact, Arnott said.

"The problem with that sort of approach is once those strings change," Arnott said. "We don't necessarily have a solution for that."

The cat-and-mouse game will pose challenges for Apple and developers, Graves said. Apple's guidance can be vague when apps are rejected, probably to prevent attackers getting tipped off about Apple's security processes.

"This story is definitely not over," Graves said. "It's taken a while, but with the proliferation of mobile and iOS being a high-value target, they're seeing a lot more attention from the black-hat society."

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jeremy Kirk

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?