House panel votes to delay net neutrality rules

Republicans 'sneak' a net neutrality rules delay into an appropriations bill

Representative José Serrano, a New York Democrat, objects to restrictions on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality rules during a House of Representatives Appropriations Committee subcommittee hearing Thursday, June 11, 2015.

Representative José Serrano, a New York Democrat, objects to restrictions on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality rules during a House of Representatives Appropriations Committee subcommittee hearing Thursday, June 11, 2015.

A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee has voted to require the Federal Communications Commission to suspend new net neutrality rules until a series of lawsuits challenging the regulations are resolved.

The action by the House Appropriations Committee's general government subcommittee Thursday comes too late to stop the new rules from going into effect as scheduled Friday. The requirement could force the FCC to suspend the rules in the coming months though it's unlikely that President Barack Obama, a strong supporter of net neutrality rules, would sign the appropriations bill requiring a delay of the regulations.

The net neutrality rules, which classify broadband as a regulated telecom service, will go into effect Friday unless a U.S. appeals court decides at the last minute to delay the rules, as requested by several broadband groups.

Net neutrality advocates, meanwhile, on Thursday called the House Republican proposal to delay the rules through an add-on rider in an appropriations bill a "sneak attack" on protections for consumers of broadband services.

The appropriations bill is "perhaps too late for this week, but it could be a problem down the road," Matt Wood, policy director at digital rights group Free Press, said by email. "And as we have seen time and again, certain members of Congress will do almost anything to protect the interests of phone and cable monopolies over those of their own constituents."

The bill's rider is an attempt to "protect the interests of a few large corporations," Representative José Serrano, a New York Democrat, said during Thursday's hearing. The requirement for the FCC to stop enforcing the rules until court challenges are resolved could give plaintiffs in those cases an incentive to drag out the lawsuits as long as possible, he said.

Serrano complained about House members adding language unrelated to funding to appropriations bills in recent years. Appropriation bills have come a "magnet for highly partisan and damaging riders," he said.

Subcommittee Republicans didn't speak about the FCC provisions in the bill during Thursday's hearing, but many Republicans have fought against the net neutrality rules, saying they add burdensome regulations that could hinder investment in broadband. Congressional Republicans have voted unsuccessfully several times to stop the FCC from passing the rules.

In April, Senator Rand Paul, a Republican presidential candidate, introduced legislation that would overturn the rules. "This regulation by the FCC is a textbook example of Washington's desire to regulate anything and everything and will do nothing more than wrap the Internet in red-tape," Paul, of Kentucky, said then. "The Internet has successfully flourished without the heavy hand of government interference."

The subcommittee approved the appropriations bill by voice vote, sending it to the full committee for consideration. If the full committee approves the bill, it would then go to the full House, and if the House approves it, to the Senate.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags governmentbroadbandinternetlegislationtelecommunicationInternet service providersU.S. Federal Communications CommissionMatt WoodU.S. House of RepresentativesRand PaulJosé Serrano

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Stocking Stuffer

SmartLens - Clip on Phone Camera Lens Set of 3

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Michael Hargreaves

Microsoft Office 365/Dell XPS 15 2-in-1

I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)

Maryellen Rose George

Brother PT-P750W

It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!

Cathy Giles

Brother MFC-L8900CDW

The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Featured Content

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?