Lawmakers try again to curb abusive patent lawsuits

The Innovation Act attempts to reduce patent lawsuits by so-called trolls

A group of U.S. lawmakers has reintroduced a bill aimed at limiting the ability of so-called patent trolls to file abusive patent infringement lawsuits.

The Innovation Act, introduced in the House of Representatives Thursday, is the same bill that passed the chamber by a 325-91 vote in December 2013. The Senate then failed to act on the legislation, killing the bill during the last session of Congress.

A bipartisan group of seven lawmakers, including Representative Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, earned praise from several tech trade groups for reintroducing the bill.

The Innovation Action is aimed at businesses that use patent licensing and lawsuits as their primary source of revenue. Critics blame these patent assertion entities [PAEs], often called patent trolls, for an explosion of patent infringement lawsuits in U.S. courts and a flood of settlement demand letters. Many of the demand letters have targeted small businesses that are users of the technologies that PAEs claim to hold patents on.

"Patent trolls don't contribute to the American economy," Representative Peter DeFazio, an Oregon Democrat and bill co-sponsor, said in a statement. "They don't build things, provide services or keep our country moving -- rather, they prey on our small businesses and innovators by manipulating patent laws and extorting billions of dollars each year from them. It's time for Congress to drive these bottom-feeding patent trolls to extinction."

The legislation would require plaintiffs in patent infringement lawsuits to identify the patents and claims infringed in initial court filings, in an effort to reduce the number of lawsuits filed with vague patent claims. The bill would also require judges to award attorneys' fees to defendants of patent lawsuits determined to be frivolous.

The bill would allow manufacturers and suppliers to intervene in patent litigation against their customers, and it creates a voluntary process for small businesses to postpone expensive patent lawsuits while larger defendants resolve similar patent lawsuits involving the same plaintiffs.

The Innovation Act would also require courts to decide early in a case whether a patent is valid, in an effort to limit the length of patent court cases based on invalid claims.

The bill would help to build a healthy U.S. patent system, said Julie Samuels, executive director of Engine, a trade group representing tech startup companies. "This smart legislation would make great strides toward fixing our broken patent system and putting patent trolls out of business," she said by email. "Despite some recent progress in the courts and in the states, trolls continue to cost our economy tens of billions of dollars a year -- and high-tech startups are hurt the most."

Also voicing support for the bill were Yahoo, Verizon Communications, digital rights group Public Knowledge and trade groups BSA, the Computer and Communications Industry Association, the National Cable and Telecommunications Association and the Software and Information Industry Association, among others.

Some groups and lawmakers have questioned the legislation, however. During the December 2013 vote on the last version of the bill, some lawmakers said the legislation would be a victory for large companies at the expense of small inventors.

This past December, members of the conservative lawyer group the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies questioned the need for the legislation, saying problems with abusive patent lawsuits seem to be exaggerated.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags governmentlegislationlegalintellectual propertypatentU.S. House of RepresentativesEngineBob GoodlatteJulie SamuelsPeter DeFazioFederalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?