Lawmakers call on FCC to reclassify broadband for net neutrality

Eshoo calls on the agency to use old telecom regulations, but take a light touch toward applying the rules

U.S. Representative Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat, introduces a bill to require mobile providers to disclose their 4G speeds.

U.S. Representative Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat, introduces a bill to require mobile providers to disclose their 4G speeds.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission should reclassify broadband as a regulated public utility in order to achieve net neutrality, but take a "light touch" while doing it, a U.S. lawmaker said Wednesday.

The FCC should be selective about what public utility-style regulations it should apply to broadband, Representative Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat, wrote in a letter to the FCC.

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, issued a net neutrality proposal in May that would allow "commercially reasonable" traffic management, but would not reclassify broadband. However, that route would not be "adequate to protect free speech, competition and the continued openness of the Internet," Eshoo wrote.

New net neutrality rules "must be based on solid legal ground and provide certainty for consumers and businesses alike," Eshoo wrote.

The FCC should reclassify broadband as a regulated telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act, but forbear from applying and enforcing many Title II regulations, Eshoo wrote.

Title II defines telephone companies as common carriers and requires them to deliver service at "just and reasonable" rates and interconnect with each other, among other regulations.

Eshoo's position is similar to one voiced by many advocates of strong net neutrality rules, but it conflicts with the position of large broadband providers Comcast and AT&T, who have called on the FCC to pass basic net neutrality rules without reclassifying broadband.

"After a decade of uncertainty, it's time to protect the open Internet, the economic crown jewel of our country, once and for all," Eshoo wrote.

Verizon Communications, filed a lawsuit to challenge net neutrality rules the FCC passed in 2010, has called on the agency to avoid new regulations. Earlier this year, a U.S. appeals court threw out a large part of the FCC's 2010 rules in response to the Verizon lawsuit.

As the FCC considers new net neutrality rules in the coming months, the agency is getting pressure from all sides.

Eshoo is the second prominent Democratic lawmaker to submit a net neutrality plan based on Title II to the FCC this month. On Oct. 3, Representative Henry Waxman, also from California, called on the FCC to adopt a "hybrid" regulatory approach to net neutrality.

Waxman called on the FCC to reclassify broadband under Title II, then use the separate Section 706 of the Communications Act, a section that directs the agency to encourage broadband deployment, to prohibit broadband providers from blocking or throttling Web content and from charging Web services for paid prioritization.

Wheeler's May net neutrality proposal would be based on Section 706, and broadband providers Comcast and AT&T have agreed with that approach.

Eshoo also called on the FCC to prohibit broadband providers from selectively blocking Web content and to prohibit paid prioritization arrangements. The agency should also require broadband providers to disclose to the public their network management and billing practices, and it should apply the same rules to mobile broadband as it does to wired broadband services, she said.

Still, much of Title II, a section of the Communications Act used to regulate traditional telephone services, would not be necessary to enforce net neutrality rules, she wrote.

"Some have painted Title II as a relic of the past, suggesting that the reclassification of broadband as a common carrier service will curtail investment and tie down the nation's communications providers in heavy-handed regulation," Eshoo wrote. "I do not support heavy-handed regulation and it is not called for."

But claims that Title II "is heavy-handed are simply unfounded," she added. "The commission already has the ability to tailor the law for market circumstances, deciding when and where to forbear from certain rules when those requirements are no longer necessary to protect the public."

Broadband providers and allied groups continue to resist calls for the FCC to reclassify broadband.

Reclassification "remains a non-starter for our industry," Walter McCormick, president of telecom trade group USTelecom, said in a statement after Waxman's proposal.

The FCC doesn't have a history of forbearing from Title II regulations once they are applied, he added. Forbearing from most Title II regulations is "an enormous task that the FCC has never undertaken," he said.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's email address is

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags governmentbroadbandregulationinternettelecommunicationat&tcomcastInternet service providersU.S. Federal Communications CommissionVerizon CommunicationsAnna EshooHenry WaxmanUSTelecomU.S. House of RepresentativesTom WheelerWalter McCormick

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments



Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?