Apple, Samsung head back to court on Thursday

Samsung is expected to call for the trial to be restarted while Apple wants higher damages

Apple and Samsung will return on Thursday to the San Jose courtroom where they battled over cell phone patents earlier this year, and Apple subsequently won damages of $1.05 billion.

The late August trial saw both companies argue in front of a jury on several issues that centered around similarities between the design and on-screen icons on a number of Samsung cell phones and Apple's iPhone. Apple argued that Samsung set out to copy elements of its market-leading mobile when designing its own phones, and the jury sided with Apple in the vast majority of its findings.

Thursday's hearing kicks off the post-trial phase of the case at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Samsung, perhaps not surprisingly, is expected to argue to Judge Lucy Koh that the trial should start over from scratch.

Lawyers are expected to argue that jury foreman Velvin Hogan should have disclosed that he was party to a lawsuit against tech company Seagate in 1993. During the jury selection phase, the jurors were asked if they had even been party to a lawsuit and Hogan didn't disclose the case. Hogan later said the jury instructions were to disclose cases in just the last 10 years.

"Mr. Hogan's failure to disclose the Seagate suit raises issues of bias that Samsung should have been allowed to explore in questioning," Samsung said in an October filing to the court.

Samsung owns just under 10 percent of Seagate after it sold its hard-disk drive division to the company last year for $1.4 billion.

Also coming into play will be Apple's recently concluded patent licensing deal with HTC. Koh has told Apple it needs to publicly disclose to the court which patents are covered by the agreement.

Apple is expected to come to court asking for damages to be increased.

The company had originally been seeking $2.75 billion, so the jury's award fell well short of the original demand. But a jury finding that some of Samsung's infringement was "willful" means the judge could increase damages to as much as three times the $1.05 billion award.

There's also a possibility that Koh will impose a ban on the sale of some Samsung products. Apple wants a number of phones and tablets banished from U.S. store shelves, but whether the court will issue such a ruling is far from clear.

Lawyers for both companies got a reminder on Tuesday of how Koh likes to run her courtroom. After imposing strict rules on the post trial motions and supporting documents that each side could file, she saw lawyers disregard her rules.

"Despite this clear direction, both parties submitted voluminous documents with their post-trial motions," Koh wrote in an order on Tuesday. "The Court plans to strike from the record all of the material submitted in violation of the Court's Order."

Lawyers for both companies have until Friday to refile their documents in accordance with her rules.

The case is 11-01846, Apple v Samsung, at the Northern California District Court in San Jose.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags mobilesmartphonesAppleAndroidlegaliosiPhoneapplicationstelecommunicationconsumer electronicsintellectual propertypatentCivil lawsuitsSamsung ElectronicsMobile OSesAndroid OS

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Martyn Williams

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Essentials

Mobile

Exec

Budget

Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Christopher Low

Brother RJ-4230B

This small mobile printer is exactly what I need for invoicing and other jobs such as sending fellow tradesman details or step-by-step instructions that I can easily print off from my phone or the Web.

Aysha Strobbe

Microsoft Office 365/HP Spectre x360

Microsoft Office continues to make a student’s life that little bit easier by offering reliable, easy to use, time-saving functionality, while continuing to develop new features that further enhance what is already a formidable collection of applications

Michael Hargreaves

Microsoft Office 365/Dell XPS 15 2-in-1

I’d recommend a Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 and the new Windows 10 to anyone who needs to get serious work done (before you kick back on your couch with your favourite Netflix show.)

Maryellen Rose George

Brother PT-P750W

It’s useful for office tasks as well as pragmatic labelling of equipment and storage – just don’t get too excited and label everything in sight!

Cathy Giles

Brother MFC-L8900CDW

The Brother MFC-L8900CDW is an absolute stand out. I struggle to fault it.

Luke Hill

MSI GT75 TITAN

I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Featured Content

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?