The top-performing Android phones: Benchmark blitz

We put six Android phones through our suite of benchmark tests to see which ones had the best CPU, graphics, and browser performance.

These days Android phones seem to be in an arms race when it comes to performance, with claims of faster processors, better graphics engines, and more cores. We put a few of the hottest Android phones available today through our rigorous suite of benchmark tests to see which ones live up to the performance hype.

The Samsung Galaxy S III (Verizon version) and the HTC EVO 4G LTE (on Sprint) have the same 1.5GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8960 processor. The Samsung Galaxy Nexus carries an older dual-core 1.2GHz TI OMAP processor, but runs the new Android 4.1 (also known as Jelly Bean). Among the many highlights of the latest version of Android are smoother graphics and overall improved performance thanks to Project Butter: According to Google, Project Butter lets the CPU and graphics run in parallel, resulting in smoother, more responsive performance on Android devices.

Our sole quad-core phone in this test group is the LG Optimus 4X HD, which uses an Nvidia Tegra 3 processor. This phone, like other quad-core phones weve seen this year, is exclusively available overseas at the moment.

We also threw two older phones into the mix, the Samsung Galaxy Note (T-Mobile) and the Motorola Droid 4 (Verizon). The Samsung Galaxy Note has a dual-core 1.5GHz Snapdragon S3 processor, while the Motorola Droid 4 has a dual-core 1.2GHz TI OMAP processor (a slight variation of the processor in the Galaxy Nexus).

Because not all benchmarking programs are cross-platform, we selected only Android phones for this round of performance testing.

The Benchmarks Explained

PCWorld Labs analysts run each smartphone that comes to us through a rigorous set of tests. The first, AndEBench, is a third-party benchmark app for Android phones that measures the performance of the CPU and the Dalvik interpreter. (Dalvik is the virtual machine in Android that runs many of the operating systems core functions.) We run two AndEBench tests: a native test and a Java test. The Labs analysts also run Geekbench, a cross-platform, multicore benchmark that measures processor and memory performance.

We test JavaScript performance using Sunspider, which measures page-load times in the browser. The Labs staff also designed an independent page-load test employing multiple JPG images, as well as text and tables. Our analysts evaluate the page-load time over a closed Wi-Fi network.

Finally, we run GLBenchmark, which measures graphics performance for OpenGL ES environments. We conduct one test with GLBenchmark Egypt 2.1.4 and one with GLBenchmark 2.1.4 Pro. Both tests measure results in frames per second; the more frames per second, the better the graphics performance is for the tested phone.

The Results

As you can see in the results charts below, the quad-core LG Optimus 4X HD smoked the competition on both AndEBench tests as well as on Geekbench. Interestingly, the Galaxy S III and the HTC EVO 4G LTE dominated in the PCWorld Page Load Tests, with the HTC EVO 4G LTE posting the fastest time at 6.5 seconds. The Galaxy Nexus recorded the fastest time on the Sunspider JavaScript Benchmark at 1.52 seconds; the HTC EVO 4G LTE finished closely behind it at 1.58 seconds. As for graphics performance, the LG Optimus 4X HD ruled the GLBenchmark Egypt Offscreen test. However, in the GLBenchmark Pro test, the Galaxy S III achieved the highest number of frames per second, with the HTC EVO coming in second.

Quad-core phones are scarce in the United States, but were hoping to see more toward the end of this year. Were also anxious for Qualcomms quad-core S4 Pro chip to ship in smarpthones. The chipset, which is currently available only in a developer tablet, performed quite well in our benchmarks.

It is important to keep in mind that benchmarks dont necessarily make or break a phone. Testing with real-world use scenarios, such as running multiple apps, transferring files, playing games, or watching video, is also important when you're judging a smartphones overall performance.

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Ginny Mies

PC World (US online)
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Luke Hill


I need power and lots of it. As a Front End Web developer anything less just won’t cut it which is why the MSI GT75 is an outstanding laptop for me. It’s a sleek and futuristic looking, high quality, beast that has a touch of sci-fi flare about it.

Emily Tyson

MSI GE63 Raider

If you’re looking to invest in your next work horse laptop for work or home use, you can’t go wrong with the MSI GE63.

Laura Johnston

MSI GS65 Stealth Thin

If you can afford the price tag, it is well worth the money. It out performs any other laptop I have tried for gaming, and the transportable design and incredible display also make it ideal for work.

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Featured Content

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?