Samsung presses court on Apple case seating, language

Jury selection in patent case to start Monday

Apple and Samsung Electronics will spend Friday afternoon in a California courtroom engaged in final arguments ahead of a highly anticipated jury trial that begins on Monday.

The two companies will be asking U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh to rule on a number of important issues, including just how much evidence can be submitted in redacted form so it can't be seen by members of the public or press.

There are also several motions concerning issues of less importance to the public, such as where lawyers sit in court and how the court refers to both companies.

Samsung asked on Thursday that both companies be referred to as "claimants." Until now the court has referred to Apple as the plaintiff and Samsung as the defendant, because that's the way the lawsuit was originally filed. Samsung launched its own lawsuit in which it was the plaintiff, but the two were combined at the request of Samsung.

Samsung hasn't objected to this language thus far, but now Samsung's lawyers say it could be unfair.

"Both parties in this action have claims against the other that will be tried to the jury in the upcoming trial. Accordingly, both parties will at times be acting as plaintiffs and both as defendants, and it is therefore important that both parties are treated the same. It is important that the terminology that is used to refer to the parties reflects this fact. In order to avoid any unfair prejudice to Samsung that may result from references to Apple as "plaintiff" in front of the jury, Samsung requests that both parties be referred to as 'claimants.'," Samsung said in a request to the court.

Not just that, but Samsung also wants to play musical chairs: sitting at the plaintiff's table when it's on the offensive.

"The general rule in courts nationwide, both civil and criminal, is that the party with the burden of proof sits nearest the jury. In keeping with this practice, it makes sense that Samsung would sit at plaintiff's table while presenting its affirmative case," Samsung said.

Samsung says that at least one other case has gone with such an arrangement, but to date Judge Koh hasn't shown much enthusiasm for anything that might slow down the case. An answer on the request later may come Friday when all three meet in San Jose.

The case is 11-01846 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The jury trial portion of the case is scheduled to begin on Monday with jury selection.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Martyn Williams

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Cate Bacon

Aruba Instant On AP11D

The strength of the Aruba Instant On AP11D is that the design and feature set support the modern, flexible, and mobile way of working.

Dr Prabigya Shiwakoti

Aruba Instant On AP11D

Aruba backs the AP11D up with a two-year warranty and 24/7 phone support.

Tom Pope

Dynabook Portégé X30L-G

Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.

Tom Sellers


This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.

Lolita Wang


It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.

Featured Content

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?