New coalition opposes Verizon and cable spectrum deals

T-Mobile, Sprint and other members say the spectrum and research deals would limit competition between Verizon and the cable providers

A proposed sale of mobile spectrum from a group of cable providers to Verizon Wireless, along with accompanying marketing and research agreements, will lead to higher prices for broadband and mobile customers, a coalition of groups opposing the deal said Monday.

Some members of the newly formed Alliance for Broadband Competition called on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice to reject the two proposed deals for Verizon to buy Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) spectrum from four cable providers for US$3.9 billion. Other alliance members said they could live with the deals if the two agencies include several conditions focused on spectrum divestitures, roaming agreements and backhaul pricing.

The proposed deals would put an "excessive concentration of spectrum" in the hands of the nation's largest mobile carrier, said Kathleen Ham, vice president of federal regulatory affairs at T-Mobile USA.

The mobile market is at a critical juncture as carriers move to provide 4G LTE and only spectrum bands AWS and 700MHz are currently available for that service, she said. "It's very important that there be spectrum available for everybody to move to LTE," Ham said.

The proposed spectrum deals, announced in December, would allow Verizon to buy AWS spectrum from SpectrumCo, a joint venture among Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Bright House Networks, and from Cox Communications, a former member of SpectrumCo. The deals would allow Verizon and the cable providers to market each others' services and would create joint research agreements focused on integrating mobile and wireline services.

Members of the new alliance include T-Mobile USA, Sprint Nextel, Public Knowledge, and the Rural Telecommunications Group and RCA, two trade groups representing rural and regional mobile carriers. The members of the alliance had previously expressed concerns and organizers said the alliance will help them work together to continue to voice those.

Comcast suggested that the groups have long been working together through Washington, D.C., public relations firm the Glen Echo Group.

"Same PR firm, different day," Sena Fitzmaurice, Comcast's vice president for government communications, said in an email. "These groups organized by this PR firm have been sending out similar press releases, doing press conferences and doing filings at the FCC together for months. There's nothing new here."

Fitzmaurice also repeated Comcast's assertion that T-Mobile, which tried to merge with competitor AT&T last year, has been "inconsistent" in talking about the competitive landscape in the mobile market. Last year, T-Mobile executives said their merger should be approved because there was "extensive competition" in the mobile market, but recently, the company has said the Verizon deal with the cable firms would do "serious harm" to mobile competition, Comcast said in an April 26 filing at the FCC.

T-Mobile also questioned when Sprint fought against the AT&T and T-Mobile deal, saying "the fact that a major wireless competitor is making these arguments should give regulators pause," Comcast noted.

But members of the alliance said the Verizon and cable deals would create a cozy relationship among former competitors. The "side" research and marketing agreements would hurt consumers, said Harold Feld, legal director at Public Knowledge. The research agreement will create a patent portfolio that allows the companies to freeze out other competitors seeking to integrate wired broadband, mobile broadband and video services, he said.

"We could not see how you honored those agreements and avoided being a cartel," Feld said. "Not only does [the agreement] create the back room where these guys can meet every month in perfect security and talk about all the areas where they're supposed to be competing, but they can continue to collude through these technologies and standards."

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's e-mail address is

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments



Victorinox Werks Professional Executive 17 Laptop Case

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?