YouTube must filter content, rules German court

But YouTube is only liable for content following notification by copyright holders

YouTube must filter content uploaded by users, a German court ruled on Friday.

YouTube was taken to court for copyright infringement in uploaded videos by German music royalty collecting society GEMA, which said that the Google-owned video site isn't doing enough to block copyright-protected music videos.

YouTube argued that it was simply a platform and not responsible for the user-generated content. In what may look like a compromise, the Hamburg District Court on Friday ruled that the video site is liable, but only after it has been informed of the copyright infringement.

However, the court wants to see YouTube implement more efficient filtering software, such as word filtering, to block illegal content uploaded by users, said court press officer Conrad Mueller-Horn.

YouTube currently offers copyright holders its Content-ID application, which allows them to search for copyright-protected material by comparing uploaded videos with a reference video -- a so-called digital fingerprint. Copyright holders can then decide to take it down, leave it up or place advertisements next to it and share in the revenue from those ads, explained Google spokesman Al Verney. He added that this system, which allows copyright holders to take down videos themselves, had proved extremely popular with other royalty-collecting agencies throughout Europe.

In practical terms, YouTube will no longer be allowed to show in Germany seven videos of songs that are protected by GEMA. But many tech-savvy Germans already take advantage of software to mask their IP address location and can access the content from foreign countries where there are no restrictions.

Civil liberties organizations are concerned about courts ordering increasing filtering technology. "It is another step towards the privatization and very fallible automation of our rights to communicate online. How healthy is the cultural life of a society which effectively bans itself from parody and mash-up of existing cultural expressions?" Joe McNamee of digital rights group EDRi said in email.

Neither YouTube nor GEMA has yet indicated whether they will appeal the court's decision. Google's official statement reads: "The ruling raises questions regarding the obligations of hosting platforms for user generated content, i.e. the use of Content-ID and word filters. We will have to examine the decision of the court before being able to comment further on this."

Follow Jennifer on Twitter at @BrusselsGeek or email tips and comments to

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jennifer Baker

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Cate Bacon

Aruba Instant On AP11D

The strength of the Aruba Instant On AP11D is that the design and feature set support the modern, flexible, and mobile way of working.

Dr Prabigya Shiwakoti

Aruba Instant On AP11D

Aruba backs the AP11D up with a two-year warranty and 24/7 phone support.

Tom Pope

Dynabook Portégé X30L-G

Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.

Tom Sellers


This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.

Lolita Wang


It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.

Featured Content

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?