Court drops Google India from objectionable content case

The court dropped the Indian unit but has retained parent Google in the suit

A court in Delhi Thursday dropped the Indian unit of Google from a civil suit regarding alleged objectionable content on its websites, but retained the parent company, the lawyer for the plaintiff said.

Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook and other Internet companies have been named in separate civil and criminal suits filed in Delhi courts over alleged objectionable religious and other content on their websites.

Microsoft and Yahoo were earlier dropped from both suits as there wasn't evidence in the complaint of objectionable content on their websites.

Google India is said to have stated before the civil court that it is not directly involved in the publishing and posting of content on Google's websites, and is a software development operation, Santosh Pandey, lawyer for plaintiff Mufti Ajiaz Arshad Qasmi said on Friday.

"We did not object to their removal from the suit," he added.

Pandey said the plaintiff would also not object to the removal of Facebook India on similar grounds.

After the removal of the Indian operations of Orkut, YouTube, and Google, and some other companies, the number of companies in the suit has now been reduced to six, among which are Google and its entities YouTube and Orkut, and Facebook in the U.S., Pandey said.

Google declined to comment.

India has been concerned about certain political and religious content on websites, and the country's Minister for Communications, Kapil Sibal, said in December that Internet companies should evolve a mechanism to remove objectionable content immediately after it is put up.

The civil and criminal cases as they unfold are likely to address critical issues such as whether the intermediary can be held responsible for content posted by a third-party, and if it is possible to filter the large volume of data posted on Internet social networking, video sharing, and other sites.

The government allowed the court to prosecute the Internet companies under various Indian laws in the criminal case. The criminal suit was filed against the Internet companies in a separate court in Delhi, by newspaper editor Vinay Rai. Google and some others appealed the criminal court's decision before the Delhi High Court. In the civil court, Google agreed to pull down the content cited as objectionable.

John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John's e-mail address is

Join the newsletter!


Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

John Ribeiro

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Cate Bacon

Aruba Instant On AP11D

The strength of the Aruba Instant On AP11D is that the design and feature set support the modern, flexible, and mobile way of working.

Dr Prabigya Shiwakoti

Aruba Instant On AP11D

Aruba backs the AP11D up with a two-year warranty and 24/7 phone support.

Tom Pope

Dynabook Portégé X30L-G

Ultimately this laptop has achieved everything I would hope for in a laptop for work, while fitting that into a form factor and weight that is remarkable.

Tom Sellers


This smart laptop was enjoyable to use and great to work on – creating content was super simple.

Lolita Wang


It really doesn’t get more “gaming laptop” than this.

Featured Content

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?