Google and Oracle negotiate potential damages

Google has proposed to pay $2.8 million in damages, should the court find it infringed two Oracle patents

In the runup to the trial date for their dispute over whether Google's Android mobile OS infringes on Oracle's Java patents, Google and Oracle are negotiating over potential damages.

In a document filed on Tuesday, Oracle responded to a number of proposals Google set forth aimed at speeding up the trial, including a suggestion to cap patent-infringement damages at around US$2.8 million.

Should Google be found to infringe, it said it would pay damages of $2.72 million on one of the patents and $80,000 on the second. In exchange, Oracle would agree not to seek additional damages for the infringement.

Google also said that for use of one of the patents, it would pay 0.5 percent of Android revenue through the end of this year, when the patent expires. It would pay Oracle .015 percent of Android revenue through April 2018, when the second patent expires.

In both cases, Oracle said the numbers need to be adjusted for multiple issues such as to include devices not cited in the suit.

In addition, Oracle said it is not willing to waive its right to seek an injunction, which Google suggests it should. "Google proposes that the trial be shortened by suggesting that Oracle accept patent damages that are lower than Oracle contends are appropriate, and waiving any right to seek injunctive relief for Google's patent infringement. Oracle cannot agree to unilaterally give up its rights, on appeal and in this Court, to seek full redress for Google's unlawful conduct," Oracle wrote in the filing.

Oracle's own damages expert valued the two remaining patents at $4.15 million after adjustments, Oracle wrote.

This kind of last-minute negotiation is common in such trials, said David Mixon, an attorney with Bradley Arant Boult Cummings who has been following the mobile patent wars. "What they're trying to do is give each side some degree of certainty," he said. "The advantage to the defendant is they know the maximum and minimum liability. The advantage to the plaintiff is they know they'll be getting something," he said. Sometimes the parties may even agree not to appeal. That could benefit a plaintiff who wins but worries about losing later on appeal, he said.

While it appears that Oracle is rejecting this proposal from Google, the companies are likely to continue to negotiate, he said.

A separate issue in the dispute is over whether Google has infringed Oracle copyright. Oracle filed the suit in 2010, charging Google with patent and copyright infringement in Android. Google denies wrongdoing.

The suit is scheduled to go to trial on April 19 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Nancy Gohring covers mobile phones and cloud computing for The IDG News Service. Follow Nancy on Twitter at @idgnancy. Nancy's e-mail address is Nancy_Gohring@idg.com

Join the newsletter!

Or
Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Nancy Gohring

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?