Google faces class action lawsuits against new privacy policy

Google's new privacy policy is already under scrutiny in the U.S. and Europe

Google faces consumer complaints in federal courts in New York and California which claim that its new privacy policy violates the company's earlier policies which promised that information provided by a user for one service would not be used by another service without the consumer's consent.

The Internet company is being charged in both lawsuits for violation of the Federal Wiretap Act, for wilful interception of communications and aggregation of personal information of its consumers for financial benefit, and the Stored Electronic Communications Act for exceeding its authorized access to consumer communications stored on its systems. Google is also charged with violation of the Computer Fraud Abuse Act, and other counts including state laws.

The plaintiffs in both suits seek to bring nationwide class action on behalf of holders of Google accounts and owners of Android devices from Aug. 19, 2004 to Feb. 29, 2012, who continued to maintain the Google accounts and own the devices after the new privacy policy came into effect on March 1 this year.

The company's new privacy policy is already under scrutiny in the European Union and in the U.S., where 36 state attorneys generals wrote to Google CEO Larry Page last month saying that Google's new policy does not give users a sufficient chance to opt out.

The new privacy policy treats the person as a single user across all Google products, and information provided from one service may be combined with information from other services, Google said.

In a suit filed before the U.S District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division on Tuesday, Robert B. DeMars and Lorena Barrios said they were required to set up their Gmail accounts when they acquired mobile devices powered by Android.

Google has not only combined the information across products, but also not provided consumers with an easy and efficient way to opt out, the plaintiffs said. "Consumers must manage their privacy settings for each Google product they use; a universal opt-out function is not available," the complaint said.

"We have no comment at this time on these lawsuits," said Google spokesman Chris Gaither. "We have not yet been served with them."

In a similar complaint before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York also on Tuesday, David Nisenbaum, Pedro Marti, and Allison C. Weiss said that the new privacy policy violates consumers' privacy rights, allowing Google to take information from a consumer's Gmail or Google+ account which may have one expectation of privacy and use it in a different context such as to personalize Google search results and advertisements.

The plaintiffs also asked for an universal opt out facility from sharing information across Google' services, according to a copy of the complaint with the Los Angeles Times.

John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John's e-mail address is

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

John Ribeiro

IDG News Service
Show Comments


James Cook University - Master of Data Science Online Course

Learn more >


Sansai 6-Outlet Power Board + 4-Port USB Charging Station

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?