Indian court issues summons to Google, Facebook headquarters for objectionable content

The Indian operations of these Internet companies had earlier said they were not responsible for running the websites

A Delhi court sent a summons to the headquarters of foreign Internet companies including Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Yahoo on Friday, in a private case against objectionable content online.

The Indian operations of some of these companies had earlier said that they were not responsible for the content, as their parent companies run the websites.

Local newspaper editor Vinay Rai found religious content on the sites that he considered offensive, and filed a complaint with a Delhi court, prompting Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Sudesh Kumar to issue notices to 21 Internet sites in December.

In an appeal against the order earlier in the week Google India told the Delhi High Court that it was not responsible for the company's websites, which are run by the parent company in the U.S., adopting a pass-the-buck stand that many Internet companies have taken when sued in India. Facebook also petitioned the High Court.

As the Indian operations of the foreign Internet companies threw up their hands and said they were not responsible, Rai sought permission from the magistrate to serve notice to the foreign entities through India's Ministry of External Affairs, he said on Friday.

The magistrate has asked the foreign entities and Indian Internet companies mentioned in the complaint to appear before the court on March 13, Rai said.

Google declined to comment on the new development. Yahoo also declined to comment as the matter was still before the courts. Facebook and Microsoft did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The case before Magistrate Kumar is being watched closely as the Indian government has also expressed concern recently about objectionable content, including religious content, on Internet sites.

India's Minister for Communications and IT, Kapil Sibal, told local TV channels in December that some of the Internet companies were allowing content that would fail to live up to the laws that they are enforcing in their own country by their own community standards. When asked by the ministry in some instances to remove certain offensive content, the Internet companies had declined citing their community standards, Sibal said.

Some newspaper reports said that Sibal had asked Internet companies to pre-screen objectionable content before it was posted online. The minister told the TV channels that he had not expected that, but wanted the Internet companies to evolve a framework whereby content that was objectionable or inflammatory could be quickly removed.

India's Information Technology Act requires intermediaries like Internet service providers to remove content that is found objectionable within a period of 36 hours of being notified of the content.

The pressure on foreign Internet companies to fall in line with the local law may have just got higher.

"Like China, we will block all such web sites," High Court Judge Suresh Kait said on Thursday while disallowing Facebook's and Google's petition for a stay on the proceedings of the court of Magistrate Sudesh Kumar. He asked counsel for Facebook and Google India to develop a mechanism to keep a check and remove "offensive and objectionable" material from their web pages, according to a report by the Press Trust of India.

John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John's e-mail address is

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection
Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

John Ribeiro

IDG News Service
Show Comments



Victorinox Werks Professional Executive 17 Laptop Case

Learn more >



Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?