Google legal move could alter course of Oracle trial

Google's request that US patent authorities review Oracle's patents has broad implications for the case, an expert says

Google's decision this week to ask the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to re-examine a number of the Oracle patents at issue in the companies' ongoing intellectual-property case could have a significant effect on how the dispute plays out.

Oracle sued Google last year, claiming the Google-backed Android OS violated a number of Oracle-held Java patents and copyrights.

Google's request that the USPTO take a second look at the validity of a number of the contested patents is not an unusual move: some 780 requests for ex parte re-examinations were filed last fiscal year, and more than 180 have been submitted so far this fiscal year, according to a Dec. 31 USPTO document. Nearly all, 92 per cent, of the 11,211 filed since 1981 have been granted, the document shows.

In 23 per cent of the cases, the patents were upheld as is, according to the document. 12 per cent were thrown out. But 65 per cent have been subject to some type of change, it states.

It's not clear when the USPTO will complete its review of the Oracle patents, should one be granted, but it likely wouldn't be anytime soon.

While the USPTO document says patent re-examinations on average take about 26 months, "everyone doubts those statistics," said Scott Daniels of the Washington, D.C., law firm Westerman, Hattori, Daniels and Adrian. Daniels was the first to report Google's USPTO filings, in a blog post on Wednesday.

Re-examinations can actually take three or four years, and even longer, Daniels said in an interview Friday. "There have been re-exams in there for 10 years."

Meanwhile, the re-examination process could potentially cause a substantial delay to the actual trial, as Google could ask the judge to issue a stay while the USPTO does its work, according to Daniels.

But one may not be granted, since Oracle and Google are competitors, according to Daniels. While Oracle does not compete with Google in the Android market, there is overlap between the companies such as in productivity suites.

"If the patentee and the accused infringer are not direct competitors [and] the patent is found by the PTO to be valid and found by the court to be valid and infringed, the court can award damages to the patentee, and he is happy because the only damage done to the patentee can be quantified in money, e.g., lost royalties," he said.

"But if the patentee and the accused infringer are direct competitors, the damage done to the patentee by the infringement is more than just lost royalties -- it is lost market share, lost visibility in the market, et cetera," Daniels added. "These damages are hard to estimate. So the court cannot cure the damage done to the patentee. He is not made whole."

While Oracle has shown no indication it wants to settle before trial, the re-examination nonetheless "kind of gums up potential settlement talks," as Google can't withdraw its request to the USPTO, according to Daniels. "If Oracle settles the case, it still has to deal with re-examination."

Meanwhile, in a separate filing this week, Google asked the court for permission to file a request for summary judgment on Count VIII of Oracle's complaint, which relates to alleged Java copyright infringements by Android.

Google argued that if any protected Oracle works are present in Android, they adhere to fair use standards.

Oracle filed a response in opposition to Google's motion on Friday, saying the copyright infringements it originally cited "represent only a snapshot of our case taken at the time they were submitted," and that discovery proceedings should reveal additional copyright violations.

Oracle and Google did not respond to requests for comment Friday.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags business issuesopen sourcetelecommunicationGooglelegalsoftwareoperating systemsOracle

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Kurt Hegetschweiler

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

It’s perfect for mobile workers. Just take it out — it’s small enough to sit anywhere — turn it on, load a sheet of paper, and start printing.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?