Court reverses Microsoft victory in patent case

A U.S. appeals court restores a jury verdict in an infringement case brought by Uniloc

A U.S. appeals court has restored a jury verdict in a multimillion-dollar patent infringement case against Microsoft but ordered a new trial on damages.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in an opinion released Tuesday, reversed a district court ruling in favor of Microsoft in a case brought by Uniloc Singapore, the maker of antipiracy software. The jury's decision finding that Microsoft had infringed Uniloc's patent was "supported by substantial evidence," wrote Judge Richard Linn, for a three-judge panel.

However, the jury award of US$388 million was "fundamentally tainted by the use of a legally inadequate methodology," Linn wrote in ordering a new trial on damages.

Microsoft, however, cheered the appeals court ruling. The appeals court put limits on the amount of damages that can be awarded based on product revenues, said David Howard, corporate vice president and deputy general counsel for Microsoft.

The appeals court ruling "may signal the end of unreasonable and outsized damages awards based on faulty methodology," Howard said in a statement. "We look forward to the new trial."

The jury from the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island ruled in April 2009 that Microsoft's product activation system infringed on a patent held by Uniloc. District court Judge William Smith threw out the jury award in September 2009.

This is the second time the appeals court has sent the case, originally filed in September 2003, back to the Rhode Island court. Smith threw out the case in 2006, but the same appeals court sent the case back for re-trial in August 2008.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's e-mail address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Join the newsletter!

Or
Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags copyrightMicrosoftlegalintellectual propertypatentCivil lawsuitsU.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitU.S. District Court for the District of Rhode IslandUniloc SingaporeWilliam SmithRichard Linn

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Essentials

Mobile

Victorinox Werks Professional Executive 17 Laptop Case

Learn more >

Exec

Budget

Back To Business Guide

Click for more ›

Brand Post

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Andrew Teoh

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

Touch screen visibility and operation was great and easy to navigate. Each menu and sub-menu was in an understandable order and category

Louise Coady

Brother MFC-L9570CDW Multifunction Printer

The printer was convenient, produced clear and vibrant images and was very easy to use

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?