Lawsuit against Apple continues as a class action

The suit contends that Apple made a secret deal with AT&T Mobility to restrict voice and data services for the iPhone

A lawsuit against Apple and AT&T Mobility will proceed as a class action, following a ruling in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday, court documents show.

The lawsuit, filed in October 2007, contends that iPhone customers had to subscribe to a two-year agreement with AT&T Mobility, and that the two companies secretly agreed to "technologically restrict voice and data service" for five years.

An amended version of the lawsuit filed in June 2008 says that the defendants did not disclose they had a five-year agreement -- believed to expire in 2012 -- that locked the plaintiffs into using AT&T Mobility's voice and data services beyond their two-year contracts.

The lawsuit also alleges that Apple "monopolized" the aftermarket for third-party iPhone applications. Also, it says an iPhone would be unusable if a customer had unlocked the phone intending to use it with another service provider.

U.S. District Court Judge James Ware wrote that the class for the suit includes people who bought an iPhone in the U.S. on a two-year contract with AT&T Mobility for voice and data service from June 29, 2007 until now. The lawsuit was originally filed on behalf of Paul Holman of Washington state and Lucy Rivello of California.

The lawsuit seeks to stop Apple from selling phones that can only be used with AT&T Mobility SIM cards or releasing software updates that block iPhone from functioning that have been unlocked, among other requests, according to an amended complaint filed in June 2008.

Apple and AT&T Mobility representatives could not be immediately reached for comment Monday morning.

Send news tips and comments to jeremy_kirk@idg.com

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags mobileApplelegaltelecommunicationantitrustat&tCivil lawsuits

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jeremy Kirk

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Edwina Hargreaves

WD My Cloud Home

I would recommend this device for families and small businesses who want one safe place to store all their important digital content and a way to easily share it with friends, family, business partners, or customers.

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?