US businesses concerned about ICANN changes

Groups representing US businesses raise concerns about ICANN ending its long-term agreement with the US government.

Some Internet-based businesses in the US would support the splitting of the domain-name governance system instead of allowing an agreement between the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) and the US government to end later this year, the leader of a US trade association said Wednesday.

When a ten-year-old agreement between ICANN and the US Department of Commerce expires in September, the organization will be vulnerable to outside takeover by other governments, said Steve DelBianco, executive director of NetChoice, a trade group of online companies.

With other countries calling on ICANN to become more international, DelBianco suggested that the organization's traditional role be split up, with ICANN retaining responsibility for overseeing generic top-level domains (TLDs) like .com and .org and a new organization overseeing country-code TLDs like .uk and .br.

Paul Levins, executive officer and vice president for corporate affairs at ICANN, and Everton Lucero, head of the Science and Technology Division of Brazil's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, both said splitting up ICANN's responsibilities would be a bad idea. Two domain-name system (DNS) groups could cause confusion and cause the Internet to work improperly, Lucero said during a panel discussion at the State of the 'Net conference in Washington, D.C.

"We should try to avoid splitting the DNS," Lucero said.

Lucero called for ICANN to become more international. The longtime agreement with the U.S. government raises concerns in other countries that the US has inappropriate control of ICANN and the DNS, he said. Even after the joint project agreement with the U.S. Commerce Department expires this year, ICANN's headquarters will remain in California, and the organization will be subject to U.S. laws, he added.

But DelBianco and Jeff Bruggeman, vice president of regulatory planning and policy at AT&T, suggested that U.S. control may be better than alternatives. "Will the US government role be replaced by some different government role?" Bruggeman asked. "It's in all of our interests to make the Internet work as well as possible."

Levins played down the end of the agreement with the US government, saying US officials would continue to be involved in ICANN. And ICANN will continue to work on the goals laid out in the agreement, including security of root servers and providing transparency and accountability, he said.

No other government will take over ICANN, he added. "We're not seeking independence," he said. "We are already independent. We're not concluding any relationship."

Audience members also questioned ICANN's proposal last year to allow the sale of new generic TLDs, such as .john or .dog, for about US$185,000. Large companies like eBay may end up having to buy thousands of new Web domains to protect their brands, DelBianco said.

Philip Corwin, counsel to the Internet Commerce Association, suggested ICANN slow down its timeline, with a second comment period starting shortly, after ICANN received more than 300 comments in a first comment round. ICANN's working timeline has the organization receiving applicants for new TLDs in the second half of the year.

Several groups have raised concerns about the new TLD proposal, with a major concern being the cost to business to register new Web sites on several new TLDs.

"Isn't it more important to do this right than to do this quickly?" Corwin asked.

Levins said ICANN will consider all the concerns brought up in the first comment period, although he wouldn't commit to changing the timeline. "You're right; it's important to get this right," he said.

Join the newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.
Rocket to Success - Your 10 Tips for Smarter ERP System Selection

Tags ICANNdomain names

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronographe 44

Learn more >

SanDisk MicroSDXC™ for Nintendo® Switch™

Learn more >

Toys for Boys

Family Friendly

Panasonic 4K UHD Blu-Ray Player and Full HD Recorder with Netflix - UBT1GL-K

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Razer DeathAdder Expert Ergonomic Gaming Mouse

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest Articles

Resources

PCW Evaluation Team

Walid Mikhael

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

It’s easy to set up, it’s compact and quiet when printing and to top if off, the print quality is excellent. This is hands down the best printer I’ve used for printing labels.

Ben Ramsden

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

Brainstorming, innovation, problem solving, and negotiation have all become much more productive and valuable if people can easily collaborate in real time with minimal friction.

Sarah Ieroianni

Brother QL-820NWB Professional Label Printer

The print quality also does not disappoint, it’s clear, bold, doesn’t smudge and the text is perfectly sized.

Ratchada Dunn

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The Huddle Board’s built in program; Sharp Touch Viewing software allows us to easily manipulate and edit our documents (jpegs and PDFs) all at the same time on the dashboard.

George Khoury

Sharp PN-40TC1 Huddle Board

The biggest perks for me would be that it comes with easy to use and comprehensive programs that make the collaboration process a whole lot more intuitive and organic

David Coyle

Brother PocketJet PJ-773 A4 Portable Thermal Printer

I rate the printer as a 5 out of 5 stars as it has been able to fit seamlessly into my busy and mobile lifestyle.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?