Webroot Internet Security Essentials 2011

Webroot Internet Security Essentials 2011: If you want "essential" protection, you'll need to look elsewhere.

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 1
Webroot Internet Security Essentials 2011
  • Webroot Internet Security Essentials 2011
  • Webroot Internet Security Essentials 2011

Pros

  • Very easy to use; secure online backup tool and hard drive scrubber

Cons

  • Slow scan speeds; below average known malware protection

Bottom Line

Webroot is very easy to use, and we appreciate the application's extras, including a secure online backup tool and hard drive scrubber (which deletes temporary junk and cache files to save space). But none of that really matters if the application isn't keeping you safe.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 1 store)

  • Kaspersky Software Internet Security 2014 (5 Us... 68.99

The word "essential" denotes something of absolute necessity—something that you can't get by without. But Webroot Internet Security Essentials 2011 ($89.95 for one year, three PCs, as of 12/2/2010) is sadly a bit of a misnomer: Its antimalware performance proved it was simply not up to the task of securing a modern PC. If you want "essential" protection, you'll need to look elsewhere.

Webroot's overall performance landed it in a distant last place among the 13 applications we tested. It had one bright spot: it fully blocked 22 out of 25 real-world malware attacks, and partially blocked the remaining three attacks. But in every other category we tested it fell short. Its known-malware detection rating of 93.2 percent isn't the worst we've seen, but it's still below average compared to the other suites we tested. False positives were also a problem, particularly when we scanned an already-infected machine: Here, Webroot's dynamic malware detection engine (which detects malware based on how it behaves) identified a whopping 20 percent of our safe yet questionable sample files as malware.

Its impact on overall system performance is miserable: At on-demand scanning, Webroot was the slowest of all 13 apps, and at on-access scanning it wasn't much better, landing 12th out of 13 for scans that run when files are opened or saved. System slowdown with Webroot running was also a problem, landing the app at ninth place. On the plus side, Webroot put forth a modestly good 70 percent rating at scrubbing active malware components from infected systems.

Webroot is at least a simple application to get around in. Designed for the rank novice, its main interface offers only a handful of options, with big and bold graphics to let you know if your system is (theoretically) protected. Video tutorials are available to hold your hand, if needed, and the company makes it easy to find additional support via prominent placement of web help links and an 800 number support line.

That might come in handy if you happen to overlook Webroot's tendency to automate its decision making for you. For example, its integrated firewall is set by default to block incoming connections if you don't override the decision within a couple of minutes. If you've gone for a cup of coffee during that time, Webroot could create a big problem on your home network where none existed before.

Webroot is very easy to use, and we appreciate the application's extras, including a secure online backup tool and hard drive scrubber (which deletes temporary junk and cache files to save space). But none of that really matters if the application isn't keeping you safe.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Recommended

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?