- Compact size, easy to use, high screen quality
- Low battery life, no AC adapter provided
At this price, and with this feature set, the TomTom ONE blows away the competition.
Price$ 799.00 (AUD)
It's not often that a lower priced model can match or even exceed the features of its more expensive brethren - but this is just exactly what the TomTom ONE achieves.
Looking to buy a GPS device? Visit our updated Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Buying Guide before you buy!
We've reviewed - and loved - the both the Go 300 and the Go 500. We found them easy to use, packed with useful features and most importantly, they got us exactly where we wanted to go. The TomTom ONE retains many of these features, but also includes some key improvements to boot.
The first notable change is in the physical design. While the Go units were somewhat squat and bulky, TomTom has slimmed down the ONE considerably, resulting in a device that is more like a PDA in its form factor. Although the ONE can be cupped in the hand or slipped into pocket, it's not yet at the stage of being portable enough where you would want to carry it around in a pocket all day. Still, the slimline design seemed to appeal to just about everyone who had their hands on it.
The second change is internal, as TomTom has shipped the ONE with an improved GPS receiver, meaning there will be less occasions when you have to use an external antenna to pick up a signal. In our driving tests, we found the ONE took anywhere between 30 to 90 seconds to first pick up a signal after being turned on and was generally quite quick and responsive.
It is important to realise that the ONE is priced considerably lower than the Go 500 and Go 300, and is aimed at the entry level market or first time users. In order to adopt this price point however, some sacrifices have been made - and the most important is perhaps with the battery life. The battery in the ONE lasted for just under two hours in our testing, which does limit its use outside of a car, and is below average.
While TomTom has included an in-car charger in the sales package, an AC adapter is missing (although can be purchased separately). This means that you can use the unit for a maximum of two hours outside a car before having to go back to your car to charge it, similar to the Navman iCN 320.
Despite the lower battery life and lack of an AC adapter, we still think consumers will certainly be getting great value for their money by purchasing the ONE.
In our humble opinion, the Tom Tom units excel when it comes to useability and the ONE continues this trend. There are in fact no buttons on the device apart from the power button. Everything else is operated on the touchscreen, with the buttons and icons large enough for you to use a finger comfortably. If you haven't used a GPS before, the TomTom interface won't pose many problems at all.
Users will continually need to quickly change the volume on a GPS unit, depending on the loudness of traffic noise, the radio or conversations. Although there are no external volume controls, the volume on the ONE can be easily accessed on screen by touching the bottom left corner of the map display. Once the volume controller appears you just slide your finger to increase or decrease volume. We found the audio levels a little softer on this unit and had to set the volume to around 60% or 70% in order to clearly hear it.
The one aspect of the ONE that just about everyone commented on was the screen. We found it to be excellent in both day and night conditions, though it is prone to glare in direct sunlight. With the large, bright and clear 3.5 inch screen, the moving 3D navigation and our planned clearly mapped out in green, we felt very comfortable at all times with the visual features of this unit. Of course the map type, colours, display preferences and modes can all be customised to your liking in the preferences section.
The audio instructions on the ONE were also fine, although there is one feature of the software we wish TomTom would change. We noticed that we would get a warning of a turn when we were some distance away and another warning at the actual turn itself. We would have however, preferred an alert a few metres before the turn, giving us an earlier warning. At times, we were unsure when to turn and had to look at the screen, not something drivers want to be doing often.
We are big fans of the TomTom user interface, although you can get the feeling of being lost in menus at times. When we test a GPS unit, we like to focus on the method used to search for addresses, as this is something you will be doing often. Unfortunately, TomTom has retained the same confusing searching function that doesn't filter street names by suburb, sometimes resulting in incorrect addresses. Additionally, the software doesn't allow you to search for a street name first, only a suburb, which is an unwanted limitation.
Perhaps the one omission that really detracts from this unit is the lack of out of the box support for red light cameras and speed cameras, something the Road Angel Navigator provides, but at a much higher price.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Early iPhone 7 reviews: You'll miss the headphone jack, but the camera and battery life are tops
- Watch out: iOS 10 install is reportedly bricking some iPhones
- Google's Pixel Launcher leak hints at the demise of the Nexus brand
- It's official: iOS 10 launches with huge improvements to iMessage, Apple Music, Siri, and more
- Goodbye GPS? DARPA preparing alternative position-tracking technology
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- TPMicrosoft Dynamics CRM Developer/ AdministratorWA
- CCMobile Application DeveloperQLD
- CCSEM / PPC / Paid Search Specialist - 6 Month Contract RoleNSW
- TPPrincipal Project ManagerQLD
- FTFront End DeveloperVIC
- FTJapanese Speaking Technical Support EngineerNSW
- CCIteration Manager / Scrum MasterSA
- FTFull Stack Web Developer .NET or JAVANSW
- CCInfrastructure Project ManagerNSW
- FTDesktop Delivery Team LeaderVIC
- CCElectronic Medications Management Solution ArchitectQLD
- CCSenior UX/UI DesignerNSW
- CCTeam Lead / Senior Software Engineer - C/C++ / Web ServicesNSW
- CCService Desk Quality Assurance SpecialistNSW
- FTFull Stack PHP DeveloperQLD
- CCFacilities Coordinator - Multiple RolesVIC
- CCC ProgrammerACT
- TPSenior Project AnalystNSW
- CCWeb Developer - Financial MarketsNSW
- CCProject Management - Infrastructure projectsVIC
- CCInfrastructure Project ManagerNSW
- FTService Desk Team LeaderNSW
- FTCloud Automation EngineerSA
- CCUI DesignerNSW
- CCProject Manager - Cabling, Network Sys Design and DeliveryNSW