Sun Microsystems OpenOffice 2.0
- Completely free, better drawing editing than MS Office, PDF output
- Slower than MS Office, no equivalent to Outlook, interface not quite as well designed
OpenOffice.org isn’t as refined as MS Office, but it’s certainly better value for money
These days there seems to be an abundance of free software floating round on the Internet. Whether you want an alternate web browser, a free CD burner, or even software to change the boot screen on your PC, somebody has created it. The trouble is with all this free software is that firstly, it's generally completely pointless (or just plain bad) and secondly it rarely turns out to be completely free. With this in mind it's nice to see OpenOffice.org 2.0. Not only is it completely free, it's very useful - an entire suite of programs a la Microsoft Office. Cynics might argue that there's no such thing as a free lunch, but in this case OpenOffice.org 2.0 bucks the trend and emerges as a viable alternative to Bill Gates' product.
As a fully featured office suite OpenOffice.org 2.0 contains a multitude of programs. These are Writer (think Word), Calc (Excel), Base (Access), Impress (PowerPoint), Draw (Visio) and Math, an equation editor. There is no bundled alternative to Outlook, nor anything to rival Publisher. Microsoft claims that OpenOffice.org 2.0 is 10 years behind the current state of Office, and only suitable for users with "limited needs". While it is undoubtedly true that OpenOffice.org's performance lags behind MS Office, and it lacks some of the more advanced functionality, in other respects it is a superior product.
Firstly, we looked at Writer, the alternative to Word and probably the program that most people will use. The first thing we noticed was that Writer definitely takes longer to load than Word. This rang true with the whole of the OpenOffice.org suite, loading files and opening the various programs definitely takes longer their MS Office counterparts. This is really only a minor inconvenience though and it by no means makes the programs unusable. When opening Writer, our first impression was that it looks almost identical to Word. The layout is incredibly similar, some of the buttons on the toolbar having near indistinguishable icons. For most purposes using Writer is also exactly the same as using Word. Virtually every function is implemented, though we did miss Word's grammar check. It may be notoriously inaccurate, but it's nice to have some kind of safeguard. Where Writer does manage to trump Word is with the ability to save files as PDFs. The useful ability to output PDFs is present in all of OpenOffice's programs and definitely gives the package bonus points. Overall, we felt that Writer was a little less refined than Word, but still contained more than enough functionality to make it a good choice.
Calc, the alternative to Excel, also bears more than a striking resemblance to its Microsoft cousin. Anyone used to using Excel should feel quickly at home. The layout is nearly identical, and again virtually every function is represented. Previous versions of Calc have suffered by having a limit on the size of the spreadsheet, but this has now been addressed and Calc boasts the same 65,536 rows as Excel. One problem that Calc does face is, again, the performance issue. Loading large files can take exponentially longer than the same operation in Excel. This is really only an issue for truly massive files, but it is still an annoyance. Other than this Calc performed perfectly, again being just as useable as Excel.
OpenOffice's PowerPoint alternative, Impress, is another decent program. The user interface, while not being quite as intuitive as PowerPoint's, is very easy to use. Anyone making the switch from PowerPoint shouldn't encounter too many problems. One disappointment is the lack of templates. Impress comes complete with a distinctly unimpressive two, both of which are ghastly. More can be downloaded from the OpenOffice.org website, but why more weren't included in the first place is a bit of a mystery. We also felt special effects didn't work quite as well as in the Microsoft offering, but this wasn't a major problem.
One nice feature is the ability to import graphics with Draw. This graphics program may not be that spectacular, but it far outstrips anything that Microsoft offer. Importing graphics into any of the other OpenOffice.org programs works seamlessly. Base functions as an adequate database tool, being compatible with both Access and MySQL databases, and again mirroring the functionality of the Microsoft offering. The final offering, Math, is a little obscure. Math purports to be a formula editor, basically making the sometimes difficult task of typing out complex instructions a little easier. It can't actually solve any calculations and it's not a patch on LaTeX, but it does the job well enough.
So, why would you buy MS Office instead of downloading OpenOffice.org for free? Although OpenOffice.org can handle MS office proprietary formats with ease (.doc, .xls etc), it doesn't perform as well with them as Microsoft's own products. As these are the standard forms of document for many people this is certainly something to bear in mind. The lack of any dedicated mail and scheduling client may also put people off, though Mozilla's free program, Thunderbird, should provide an acceptable alternative.
There have also been lots of complaints about bugs; purportedly there are many thousands of bugs in the program waiting to be fixed. We didn't encounter any major problems, but they do appear to exist. Should you encounter any problems there is no dedicated support to help out either. The only help you can expect to receive is from the many legions of fans on the forums of OpenOffice.org's website.
There are a couple of things however, that go in OpenOffice's favour. Firstly, it is compatible with all versions of Windows since Windows 98, unlike the latest versions of Office which insist on the user running XP. OpenOffice.org will also happily run on Linux and Solaris, areas which Microsoft wouldn't touch with a barge pole. One final consideration is the dancing paperclip. There isn't one on OpenOffice.org. Nevermore will you have to suffer the infernal blinking of "Clippit". We think this alone is reason enough to ditch Microsoft's product and make the switch!
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Linksys AC5400 MU-MIMO Gigabit router
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Microsoft L5V-00027 Sculpt Ergonomic Keyboard Desktop
Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive
Smart LED Bulb LB130
Huawei Mate 9
Google Daydream VR headset
Acer Swift 7
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
Lexar® Portable SSD
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
Surface Pro 4
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
Dell XPS 13 laptop
HP Pavilion x360 13”
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Village Roadshow aims to block 40 pirate sites
- Analysts peer into Microsoft's rumored Windows 10 Cloud
- Google lets users get social with Maps
- Microsoft unveils a bonanza of security capabilities
- Here's how Evernote moved 3 petabytes of data to Google's cloud
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- How to quit Pokemon Go (or to start enjoying it again)
- Japan's pop culture, anime-friendly, J-Pop shrine, Kanda Myojin
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- TPSenior Analyst Programmer - ContractQLD
- FTLife/400 Resource - PermanentNSW
- FTFront-End DevOps Developer/Consultant - IT Services - SydneyNSW
- FTDatabase Modelling SpecialistACT
- CCMidrange ProvisioningNSW
- FTSystem AdministratorNSW
- FTDynamics AX Functional Consultant (Manufacturing and Trade & Logistics Modules)QLD
- TPFront End DeveloperWA
- CCAgile CoachNSW
- CCService Designer (CX)NSW
- CCInfrastructure Business AnalystNSW
- CCPMO Analyst - Financial ServicesNSW
- CCSenior .NET DeveloperNSW
- CCProject Manager - Telco Networks EngineeringVIC
- FTSenior Software EngineerVIC
- TPIT Project Officer - TMRQLD
- TPScrum MasterVIC
- FTDevops EngineerVIC
- FTEnterprise Architect l Practice Manager - Archimate 3.0, eTOMNSW
- CCIT Support TechnicianNSW
- TP.Net DeveloperSA
- FTLevel 3 EngineerNSW
- CCIT Solutions ArchitectQLD
- CCDemand/ Resource AnalystVIC
- CCFullstack .Net DeveloperNSW