- Interesting design, anti-glare coating
- Trailing was evident in motion blur tests, colours not displayed particularly well
This monitor didn’t fare too well in our tests for motion blurring and it also struggled slightly in the colour tests. It did have the best viewing angles in the review though, as well as the best aesthetics, but these features aren’t enough to justify its high price tag. We expected much better overall performance for this price.
Price$ 949.00 (AUD)
This expensive monitor demonstrates the most intricate industrial design - it doesn't have a neck. Instead, the front bezel, which is 3cm wide across the top and along the sides, extends all the way down to the desk, where it curves forward slightly and acts as the base for the screen.
Similar to a picture frame, a rear rest then unfolds outwardly, which allows the monitor to sit, and also allows the monitor to be tilted back. It's a very nifty design that is surprisingly stable and its only drawback is that it does not allow for the monitor to be tilted forward. The control buttons for this monitor are located under the lower bezel and are slightly awkward to use to as a result.
This monitor also has an anti-glare coating. It's a thin film that makes up part of Sony's Clear Bright technology to boost the contrast ratio of the screen as well as improve the viewing angle. This is perhaps how Sony is able to claim a contrast ratio of 1000:1 with this unit. Its contrast was indeed excellent in our office.
Likewise, the wide viewing range of the screen was the best in the round-up. We were able to view the screen exceptionally well from the side and rom the top without noticing much degradation in colour and brightness. This is due to the MVA technology that the panel incorporates.
This monitor has a speed of 12ms, which makes it one of the quicker models in the round-up. However, we noticed significant trailing around the edges of the text in our motion blue tests, particularly with black text on a white background, while white text on a black background failed to remain white as it moved across the screen.
Testing with DisplayMate showed that this monitor may also struggle to display colour gradations properly. This was particularly evident in the 256-level colour intensity tests, where colour banding was clearly visible. So, if you want a monitor for intense graphics work, you may wish to look for a model with a 16.7 million colour rating. Nevertheless, we found this screen vibrant for everyday usage and especially for movie watching.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Windows 8.1 tablet
- 2 Samsung Galaxy Tab S (10.5) 4G review
- 3 LG G3 review
- 4 Nokia Lumia 930 review
- 5 Asus G550JK gaming notebook
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- IBM Watson cooks up some new dishes
- Apple will keep pushing for a sales ban on Samsung products
- Facebook testing mobile searches for old posts
- Appeals court denies Oracle request to restore $1.3 billion judgment against SAP
- Boston's Bolt launches hardware companies
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.