- Good quality video, excellent feature set
- Can’t play the DVDs back on a regular DVD player, short recording time, lower bit rate than SR1
As the first DVD-based high definition camcorder the UX1 has good quality video, but misses out on practicality.
Price$ 2,299.00 (AUD)
As one of Sony's two new high definition camcorders, the HDR-UX1 should be an attractive proposition. In many ways it is, with good quality video, a reasonable feature set and excellent construction. Unfortunately the UX1 just can't compare to its sibling, the HDR-SR1 with regards to usability. Despite being almost identical products, there is one major difference: the SR1 uses a 30GB hard disk while the UX1 uses mini DVDs, which severely limits it both in terms of recording time and playback.
Both video cameras use a 2 megapixel CMOS sensor, which provides excellent quality video at a resolution of up to 1080i. We found the picture to be crisp and sharp, with far greater detail than standard definition. Colour representation is excellent with great variation between tones and vivid primary shades. There's little sign of the compression artefacts that usually spoil DVD camera footage, and the ghosting we have come to expect from MPEG2 footage was nowhere to be seen. We did have a few minor problems in areas of high contrast, with some fringing apparent along bright borders. For the most part this wasn't noticeable, but on white areas against darker backgrounds it gave a slightly unnatural look.
Still images are about average for a camcorder of this price range, with the respectable 4 megapixel images good enough for making 6 x 4in prints. The built in flash is a useful inclusion, and the various manual options, including manual white balance, manual focus, and spot metering and focus can all be used for still images too. One set of manual options that are missing however, both for still images and video, is the ability to change aperture, shutter speed or gain. However Sony almost never includes these options, so it really came as no surprise.
Both of Sony's new high definition camcorders share some excellent features. For a start there's the inclusion of microphone and headphone jacks. This is excellent news for those who are serious about audio quality. Then there's the multi function ring. This allows the user to make fine adjustments to manual options such as focus, white balance and exposure, and makes the process far simpler than having to toggle buttons back and forth. We also appreciate the inclusion of the huge 3.5in LCD touch screen. Running a new user-friendly menu system, the UX1 is considerably more intuitive than past Sony models. The 10x optical zoom is fast and responsive, and with Sony's Steadyshot image stabilisation active we didn't had a problem with shaky pictures.
One possible limitation of the new wave of high definition camcorders is the way in which they encode their footage. Sony has used the AVCHD codec for the UX1, which is based on MPEG4. As the codec is in the early stages of adoption there are currently no editing programs available that support this format. To cut videos or make changes you'll need to use Sony's simplistic proprietary software that comes bundled in the box. The first of the mainstream editing packages will start supporting AVCHD around March 2007.
High definition footage also presents another problem for the UX1: high definition videos are understandably big. With the HDR-SR1, roughly four hours of footage could be shot at the highest quality level before filling the hard disk. However with the HDR-UX1 on its highest quality settings, which incidentally don't offer as high a bit rate as the SR1 (12Mbps versus 15Mbps), you get a meagre 15 minutes, or 30 minutes should you be using a dual layer disc (the UX1 supports DVD+/-R and RW in both single and dual layer formats). You don't need us to point out that 15 minutes isn't a lot, and for many users this figure will make the UX1 totally impractical.
The great selling point of standard definition DVD camcorders was that you could record your videos and then pop the disc straight in your DVD player to watch at home. Should you try that with discs written on the UX1 however, all you're likely to get is a nasty error message. As they use a completely different codec you'll need a High Definition capable player just to run them. The only option is to play the discs back from within the camera or copy them to a computer, so much of the ease of use of DVD camcorders is lost with this unit.
Thus we have the crux of the problem: what's the advantage over the HDR-SR1? Well it's a bit cheaper, but at this price point a few hundred dollars doesn't really make much difference. The UX1 doesn't even look as swish and attractive as the SR1. Despite these problems with usability the HDR-UX1 is still an excellent machine underneath, especially for an early AVCHD model.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 2 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 3 Parrot Mambo Drone review
- 4 Evapolar USB air conditioner review
- 5 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
Latest News Articles
- AT&T will acquire Time Warner for US$85.4b in content play
- Facebook adds Apple TV and Chromecast support as video push ramps up
- Remocam review: This security camera can control your home appliances
- Logitech's C922 webcam is the revered C920's vastly upgraded successor
- Jump the line for the newest Chromecast features with Google's new preview program
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- TV buying guide: What to look for when buying a TV in 2016
- Best iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus plans: Optus vs Telstra vs Vodafone vs Virgin
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- CCInfrastructure Specialist :SCOMWA
- FTNetwork & Gateway EngineerACT
- FTFront End Developer / UXNSW
- FTFrontend Developer/DesignerNSW
- FTBusiness Analyst - Health Industry - Melbourne CBDVIC
- FTSenior UX/UI DesignerNSW
- CCMiddleware SpecialistNSW
- FTDynamics CRM DeveloperVIC
- CCMicrosoft Dynamics AX Solution Architect (Permanent and/or Contract Option)VIC
- CCBase24 DeveloperNSW
- TPNetwork and Voice EngineerVIC
- CCSenior Siebel DeveloperACT
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Technical ArchitectACT
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (JAVA/SQL/Web) 161026/AP/632Asia
- FTSenior MS Dynamics CRM ConsultantVIC
- FTCapacity PlannerNSW
- FTSoftware DeveloperQLD
- FTJunior / Entry Level IT roleNSW
- FTPHP Developer (full stack)WA
- TPiOS Developer (Mobile)NSW
- CCSenior Java DeveloperNSW
- CCITSM Process AnalystNSW
- FTCommercial Contracts Manager - DefenceSA
- CCSenior / Lead UX DesignerNSW
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW