Ricoh Australia Caplio 400G
- Reasonable features
- Big, poorly sealed, limited underwater function, weak sensor, expensive
A novelty camera that fails at its only gimmick.
Price$ 699.00 (AUD)
Ricoh's Caplio 400G seems to rely upon novelty value to attract customers. It is dubbed as a water-resistant, highly durable camera and when looking at the cost, feature set and camera as a whole, it becomes clear there is not much else on offer. Unfortunately, even the water resistance is poorly implemented, making the 400G a less than desirable purchase.
The camera is massive. Measuring 13 x 7 x 7.5cm, it feels like a camera pulled right out of last decade. It is cased in heavy plastic and appears at first glance to be a sturdy, underwater-ready model. However, the 400G is designed to shoot at a depth of just 1 metre for up to half an hour, which doesn't feel like enough for any real underwater usage. It can be used in a shallow pool for example, but is unsuitable for any sort of deep water or diving shots. Being able to submerge the camera in water is a nice touch, but with those limitations it just feels like a gimmick.
After our underwater tests, we found the camera was still leaking water six hours after being dried off. Its construction may be suited to gritty, outdoors use, but there are other, equally sturdy cameras that are much better value for money.
The underwater photos themselves were also less than impressive. The camera comes with no underwater shooting mode, which is very strange for a model billed as an underwater camera. Thus, the pictures were very blurry and lacking in definition. There are six preset modes which cover a bare range of circumstances, including portrait, night mode and landscape.
The regular pictures we took came out slightly better. For a 3.2 megapixel model, the 400G produces some very good images, a little blurred, but great colour and reasonable detail. For the price of this camera, however, you can get a solid 6 or seven 7 model with far superior performance.
The limited underwater use really isn't enough to justify the purchase of this model, especially as other cameras come in "weatherproof" designs, or with optional underwater cases. It is also worth noting the manual doesn't seem to mention anything about the water-resistant qualities of the camera, or instruct you in its use underwater, which made the situation even more frustrating for us.
We were hoping the camera would salvage some dignity with a decent set of features and this is one area in which it did a reasonable job. The camera has very basic white balance, exposure and sharpness controls, as well as simple continuous shot function and a 3X optical zoom. We did like the manual shutter speed control, which extended from 1/2000th to eight seconds. This is a nice range for such a low-megapixel model, and gives that extra little bit of control.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Boom: SanDisk just dropped the world's largest SD card
- Camera app makers tap into RAW power with iOS, and look forward to dual lenses
- Google Camera 3.2 lets you snap pictures while recording video
- CES 2016: Top 10 trends
- Sony α7S II aimed film-makers and low light photographers
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- FTWeb Developer/ DesignerNSW
- TPFrontend DeveloperNSW
- FTTest AnalystVIC
- CCBusiness Specialist - TelcoQLD
- CCSolution Architect-PHPNSW
- FTSitecore .Net DeveloperVIC
- FTHadoop DeveloperVIC
- CCSSIS DeveloperNSW
- TPSolution Architect | HRISQLD
- CCTechnology Specialist-AWS MigrationNSW
- CCMainframe Project ManagerVIC
- CCSenior Project EngineerACT
- CCSiebel Developers x 8ACT
- TPProject Manager - Documentation RebrandQLD
- CCSales Support AssociateNSW
- CCAccount Executive - SMEVIC
- CCSales Support AssociateNSW
- CCServicing Financial Planner - CBDNSW
- FTSenior Software EngineerWA
- CCIAM Technical Specialist/ConsultantWA
- TPSenior System Engineer - WintelVIC
- FTLead Front End DeveloperVIC
- CCProject Manager - Community Transport SolutionsACT
- CCSenior Automation TesterVIC
- CCDigital Producer | 3 Month Contract roleNSW