Open Door Networks iEnvision
Bring the Web’s images with you
- Nice interface, easy to use
- Lack of configuration options, slow loading times, no iPhone optimisation
Leaving aside its cost, this iPhone app shows plenty of promise but fails to deliver in important areas, including speed and optimisation for the iPhone.
Price$ 12.99 (AUD)
In an attempt to tidy the mess that is the World Wide Web's image collection, Open Door Networks Inc. has ported its photo amalgamation software to the iPhone. Cleverly (or not so cleverly) named iEnvision, the application grabs images from various Web sites and presents them in an interface that closely resembles the device's native photo application. Speed, price and several functionality flaws prevent iEnvision from being a must-have iPhone application.
iEnvision works by gathering photos from multiple Web sites and then organising them based on topics and unique identifiers such as author and location. Users choose a general topic such as Art or Newspaper Front Pages and then a subtopic in order to view a slideshow of the gathered images. Slideshows are automatic, although the user can interrupt at any time by simply swiping to the next photo. A small icon on the control panel at the bottom redirects the user to an image's site of origin in Safari.
The application is extremely simple to use, but herein lies one of its problems: there are very few options to configure. Slideshow timing is automated, and the only possible options in the application are the ability to delete image groups or sub-groups. Groups can only be created or modified using Open Door Networks' Mac or PC-based Envision software.
iEnvision takes advantages of the iPhone's sensors. The application will respond to the iPhone's accelerometer, switching between landscape and portrait modes. Multi-touch photo manipulation is also available, allowing users to pinch and zoom into pictures when desired. Flicking a finger right to left also transitions photos, although the way the application loads them detracts from the smoothness of this action.
There is no iPhone optimisation apparent in the application, meaning that images are often pixelated on the iPhone's 320x480 pixel resolution screen.
Image loading can also be a pain. The iPhone Facebook application loads a low-resolution image that is subsequently replaced by a higher-resolution version, which allows for quicker loading times. iEnvision will attempt to load a full resolution picture before displaying it, often making users wait and decreasing the application's ability to smoothly transition between photos.
Like many other iPhone Apps, speed is a key problem. Using the iPhone over a Wi-Fi network connected to ADSL2+ broadband, iEnvision took anywhere from four to 37 seconds to load the first photo in a group, with a subsequent four to five seconds required for each image to load. Optimisation could have heavily decreased this wait time.
For what is essentially a picture-a-day application, $12.99 is simply too expensive.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Snapchat just got way easier to use thanks to a new search bar
- Microsoft is retiring the Blue Screen of Death for some users
- 2016 will be 1 second longer: Google can help you cope
- Microsoft declares summer's Windows 10 upgrade fit for business
- Stop pouting: Google’s Santa Tracker is updated just in time for the Christmas countdown
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- FTSenior .Net DeveloperVIC
- CCIT Support AnalystVIC
- FTEnterprise Sales ManagerNSW
- FTLevel 3 EngineerNSW
- FTEnterprise Sales ManagerACT
- FTMedia Architect/LeadNSW
- CCProject Coordinator - TelcoVIC
- FTSystems Engineer - SCCM & Lync/Skype for BusinessQLD
- FTBI Tech Lead l SQL/RDMS/ DB2/ ETL/ UML/ XML/ Big Data technologiesNSW
- FTSecurity Incident / SOC Analyst (Tier 1) - Permanent - North Ryde BasedNSW
- FTManager - Field ServicesVIC
- CCBig Data Developer - Government - 12 Month Contract - SydneyNSW
- TPSenior Business Analyst - Travel and Expense Management SystemQLD
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW
- TPSenior PMO AnalystNSW
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantQLD
- CCNetwork Design EngineerACT
- CCData Migration Lead - SAPNSW
- FTData Analyst - MDMNSW
- FTFull stack Developer - Senior (Java or C# and AngularJS) x 3QLD
- CCSolution Lead/ArchitectVIC
- CCJava Developer/ Guidewire DevelopersQLD
- CCeLearning Support Officer - Moodle/Google appsACT
- TPPrincipal Business Analyst - DAFFQLD