NU Dark Shadow Mp3 Sunglasses

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 5
NU Dark Shadow Mp3 Sunglasses
  • NU Dark Shadow Mp3 Sunglasses
  • NU Dark Shadow Mp3 Sunglasses
  • NU Dark Shadow Mp3 Sunglasses

Pros

  • The extra lenses are good.

Cons

  • Poor sound, Poor design, Poor concept, Poor earbuds, Poor storage.

Bottom Line

We can’t, in good conscience, recommend these glasses, if you really want an Mp3 player in your glasses, get yourself the Oakley Thump.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 5 stores)

  • Cardigan NO.NU. for women 104.98
  • Short dress NO.NU. for women 252.80
See all prices

Lo and Behold there is something sinister lurking in your digital convergence store, a dark force hell bent on making their users look foolish, ridiculous and very un-cool. The Nu Dark Shadow MP3 sunglasses are a tragically inferior version of the Oakley Thump and since the Thump has issues to begin with, things don't bode well for Nu.

The most important thing in any pair of sunglasses is design. Wrap around sunglasses appeal to many people but even those brave wearers should steer clear of the Dark Shadows as they scream inferior quality. They aren't even comfortable, sitting awkwardly on the bridge of the nose and when combined with the low grade cyborg-like MP3 player on the sides of the glasses, you feel like you are the butt of a joke you don't quite get.

The headphones that come with the glasses are fairly terrible as they tend to cut off quite a bit of treble and bass on both ends of the spectrum. Even the mid tones aren't terribly impressive and the volume comes up shy of an acceptable level. In an environment with high ambient noise, these headphones nosedive to deplorable levels, becoming hard to hear and even harder to tolerate.

The MP3 player is so incredibly featureless. It plays MP3, WMA and ADPCM and that's about it. There's an Mp3 recorder too but unless you are in a quiet area, the recording quality is fairly useless. As if the lack of features wasn't enough, the glasses are only 256MB so after you get your 60 songs on there you can rejoice at how brilliantly inadequate the storage is. There is also a 512MB version but we live in the age of 4GB flash drives. The SanDisk Tranflash cards are wafer thin and smaller than the finger nail on your pinkie finger. Surely we can do better than 512MB.

Not only is the playback a drawback, not only does the audio quality hurt the brain with its mediocrity but the buttons to access all these fine features are confusingly stupid and non-responsive. The on/off button is also the play/pause button, the random playback button is also the delete button, the decrease volume is also the previous track button, the forward track is also the increase volume and so on and so on. Each button works based on how long you press it but there is no audible tone to tell the wearer that the unit has recognized you have pressed a button and since you obviously can't see the fancy lights on the side of your head, you never know what's going on with the unit at any one time. The anger and frustration that swells when using this product could make baby kittens cry.

The battery life is okay, rated at about 8 hours of playback but the recharge time of 2 hours isn't the best. Also, one of the only good points of this product is the extra lenses which easily clip on and off while still remaining rather sturdy. There is also a reinforced nylon soft vault included in the package (also known as a case) but it's so chunky that it would only be useful if kept in the car and is impossible to carry comfortably in the pocket.

We also had issues with the installation software which repeatedly crashed our machines but even when it didn't, the splash screen dominated the whole screen with the installation dialog hidden in the background, only accessible by pressing control-alt-delete and shutting it down manually.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?