Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary
Halo's remake hasn’t done much to push the envelope, but it’s a good stop-gap filler
- It’s a classic game, remade very competently
- Enough with this FPS formula, already.
It’s possibly the least spectacular Halo release to date, but it’s proof that Microsoft can handle this franchise without Bungie.
Price$ 59.00 (AUD)
The original Halo is a game we can simultaneously praise and hate. A real pioneer of the FPS genre, a lot of what we see in the thousands of FPSers released on a weekly basis have cribbed many of their ideas from trends Halo set in motion.
Indeed, while Halo itself might have just capitalised on a few of the ideas that were emerging from the likes of Call of Duty, it went a long way to popularising them.
For obvious reasons, the remake hasn’t done nearly as much to push the envelope, but it’s a good stop-gap filler while fans wait for the true new Halo game to be released next year.
It looks the part of a modern game — the visual aesthetic of Halo: Combat Evolved was superb back in the days of the original Xbox, and with a HD coat it really develops that big-budget, space opera atmosphere. Planets look suitably alien, enemies run around with a great fluidity, guns flash with the usual science fiction rainbows of colour. The only disappointment is in the facial animations during dialogue and cut scenes. That part is plastic and stiff, a remnant of the past that most modern remakes struggle with.
The game itself plays out much like the Halo we know and have played a million times since — run down a corridor (whether in a spaceship or the usual FPS artificial corridors of mountains, trees and invisible walls). Every so often you’ll run into a swarm of enemies. Kill them. Run down the corridor a bit more and kick off a cutscene.
Every so often you’ll have a vehicle section to “enjoy” (the Warthog could still use some control tweaking). And then eventually, after the explosions can’t get any bigger, it’s game over.
To be brutally honest I am thoroughly sick of this formula. Yes, Halo does it really well, and yes, it’s a formula that enough people seem to enjoy to make the FPS the dominant genre of the industry right now. After a few hundred of these games, though, it’s a formula that’s getting about as tired as playing the duck shooting gallery at a carnival a thousand times.
But then to many, that single player game is hardly the point of Halo. The multiplayer is where it’s at, and here’s an opportunity to play some really classic maps online, perhaps for the first time. Halo’s multiplayer maps are generally a balanced bunch and personally this game is a touch more accessible in multiplayer than, say, Call of Duty or Battlefield. You’ll still have to deal with the irritating children who have only just discovered how cool it is to swear, but at least the game itself won’t be so uncomfortable.
Ultimately Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary is just a stop-gap. Microsoft needed to have something to tide fans over until Halo 4, and this does a reasonable job. The game itself is showing its age a touch, and does very little to advance a genre that is rapidly approaching stagnation. Those who have fond memories of the original game, and Halo fans who might have missed out on the original, should get a kick out of this.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Nintendo's Fire Emblem Heroes looks sharp, but will it survive the freemium transition?
- Nintendo's bringing Super Mario Run to Android in March, but Fire Emblem's coming first
- The Switch is a mix of Nintendo's past consoles
- Dead Rising 4 impressions: 'Tis the season to BBQ zombies with your flaming sword
- This week in games: Free Titanfall 2 weekend, Star Wars Battlefront meets Rogue One
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- TPSenior Test Analyst - TAFEQLD
- CCSenior Business AnalystSA
- FTLife/400 Technical Business AnalystNSW
- FTLevel 2 Service DeskNSW
- CCAutomation Test Analyst - Geospatial and Industrial EnterpriseVIC
- CCCapacity and Performance Analyst - Mainframe - Z SystemsVIC
- FTSecurity Incident / SOC Analyst (Tier 1) - Permanent - North Ryde BasedNSW
- CCICT Contracts ManagerSA
- FTiOS DeveloperNSW
- FTProject Delivery Manager | PortfolioQLD
- CCSystem EngineerSA
- CCSAP HR/ Payroll ConsultantQLD
- TPBusiness/Data AnalystQLD
- FTDevOps EngineerNSW
- FTLevel 3 Support ConsultantNSW
- CCProject DirectorVIC
- TPSenior Applications Support AnalystSA
- TPBusiness Project Manager IntegrationNSW
- CCTechnical WriterNSW
- FTTechnical Business AnalystNSW
- FTSenior Java EngineerACT
- CCMigration OfficerQLD
- TPTechnical WriterACT
- CCSenior Business AnalystNSW