Microsoft Windows Movie Maker 2.1
- Free for XP users, good collection of wipes and transitions.
- No DVD output from the application, Windows XP only.
A very good DV editing application for the new user and the price is right although the program is beginning to show its age.
Price$ None (AUD)
Lets not beat around the bush, the original Movie Maker that came with Windows ME was a dog of a program when it was first released, and being a version 1.0 release is no excuse - Apple's first Version of iMovie (also free with the OS) was an extremely strong program. The version that arrived with Windows XP was not much better, although there were some nice tools for making a web movie to share with family and friends.
The latest version of MovieMaker is the first release that could be truly called a DV editing program rather than merely a curiosity and as a second effort, it is an extremely solid and useful application for the new user.
Movie Maker 2 rectifies the significant shortfalls in the original application and even surpassed Apple's iMovie Version 2, its competitor when first released, in some areas. Movie Maker 2 had more titles, effects and transitions than iMovie 2 and unlike iMovie 2, provided support for devices such as analog VCRs or camcorders with the appropriate capture card installed.
Unfortunately, Apple has released three new versions of iMovie while Microsoft seem to have more important issues to deal with, namely completing the new Windows Vista operating system.
Video capture from a camcorder couldn't be easier with Moviemaker 2.1, with the program prompting you for the type of video quality you prefer and the output options to select. During the capture process, you can choose to have the video file separated into smaller clips based on changes in a scene or you can transfer the video as one large clip. If the "create clips for video files" check box is not selected when you import a video file, the video file is imported and appears as one whole clip in Windows Movie Maker. Thankfully, You can run clip creation after the video file is imported into Windows Movie Maker to separate the clip into smaller clips by going to Tools > Create Clip.
Once you have finished capturing your video the program divides your footage into a series of clips stored in a collection area. The collection area contains all the relevant assets you need to make a movie, which could include anything from music and video clips to still images and background patterns for title sequences.
Apple has released iMovie HD recently and it surpasses MovieMaker 2.1 in so many areas it's almost unfair to mention them in the same sentence. However if you just want to make a simple video and have an additional program to make your own DVD movies, then MovieMaker 2.1 is definitely worth a look and for the price, you have nothing to lose.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Windows 8.1 tablet
- 2 Samsung Galaxy Tab S (10.5) 4G review
- 3 TomTom Runner Cardio GPS watch
- 4 LG G3 review
- 5 Nokia Lumia 930 review
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- IEEE standards group wants to bring order to IoT
- InfiniDB going out of business, but its database will live on as open source
- FCC questions how to enforce net neutrality rules
- SAP CEO Bill McDermott on why Concur is worth $8.3 billion
- Alibaba shares open at a high $92.70
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.