Leadtek WinFast PX7950 GT TDH (GeForce 7 Series)
- Value for money.
- Not top of the range performance.
Although this isn't the top of the range, its slightly lower performance is negligible, especially when weighted with the price drop. If you're looking for a card to last until you purchase a new system with everything you've ever dreamed of, this card is a great option.
Price$ 425.00 (AUD)
NVIDIA has just released their new flagship card with all the bells and whistles to take us into the next generation of gaming. But if you're just looking to upgrade from a low-end system and aren't planning to blow your budget on a top of the range card right now, the LeadTek WinFast PX7950 GT TDH, based on NVIDIA's GeForce 7 Series, is a sensibly priced solution that will still boost your frame rate and give you something to work with until it's time to roll out a whole new system. We took a look at the standard edition, but a slightly more powerful Extreme edition is also available.
Because this card is based on the G71 chip (built using a 90nm manufacturing process), the very same that brought us all other NVIDIA 7900 cards, including the recently superseded flagship model the GeForce 7900 GTX (GV-NX79X512DB-RH-ED), you can be assured that you're going to get a fairly good performance. Though performance wasn't quite up to that of the 7900 GTX, based on the recommended retail price this card is slightly cheaper.
It's immediately clear that there are some physical differences in the cards. Unlike the bulky fan and heat pipe combination that cools the 7900 GTX, this board has a modest 60mm fan supported by a basic heatsink and takes up only one PCI slot. The board is also noticeably shorter than its older brother, giving you more leeway if you've got a cramped case. We seem to find that the high-end ATI cards tend to be rather noisy, where NVIDIAs cards are a little quieter. Despite the smaller size of the fan, the PX7950GT TDH also has fairly low noise emissions, especially when idle, which can be a blessing when you're not gaming.
Other than the physical comparison, the only real difference between this card and the high-end 7900 GTX is in the clock speeds. Both cards have 24 pixel pipelines, 8 vertex pipelines and use 512MB of GDDR3 memory. The 7950 GT has a core clock speed of 550MHz and a memory clock of 700MHz (1400MHz). Both the core clock and memory are a good 100MHz slower than the 7900 GTX. However, in our benchmarks it pulled off scores that suggest it should handle most of what's out on shelves without too much problem. And against our chosen card of comparison, the 7900 GTX, it had noticeable, but also negligible score variations. In 3DMark 2006 it scored 4259 compared with a score of 4487 from the 7900 GTX. In FEAR's in-game benchmark, with maximum quality settings, including 16x AF (anisotropic filtering), 4x AA (antialiasing) and a resolution of 1280x960, it averaged 56fps (frames per second), eight frames less than the GTX, but still extremely playable. In Quake 4 at a resolution of 1280x1024 in high quality settings, it averaged 70fps, five frames less than the GTX. One other nice addition that you'll benefit from this card's release is compliance with HDCP copy protection, for those planning to use their PC to watch high-definition media.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Playing chicken with a Tesla Model S
- 2 Audi TT (2015) review: A smarter take on the sports coupe
- 3 Microsoft Lumia 640 review: Honouring Nokia's legacy
- 4 Apple Watch review: saving time
- 5 Samsung SUHD smart TV (JS9500) review
Deals on Good Gear Guide
- Networking, Wireless & VoIP
Deals on Good Gear Guide
Latest News Articles
- Mac users exposed by zero-day vulnerability
- Intel shows first Skylake tablet
- Hands-on with AMD's FreeSync: The technology that could kill Nvidia's G-Sync
- Qualcomm's Raspberry Pi-like computer has wireless capabilities
- Windows 10 powers up PC gaming with DirectX 12, native DVR, deep Xbox integration
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.