Konica Minolta MagiColor 2500W
- Very low price, high-quality text and graphics prints
- Networking option costs $190, one paper tray, no upgrade options
This is the lowest-priced colour laser we've seen -- and it offers top-notch print quality. Its only downfall is the cost of a networking adapter.
Price$ 499.00 (AUD)
The Konica Minolta MagiColor 2500W is essentially the same as the Magicolor 2400W model we originally reviewed in March 2005 except that the price has plunged to $499--the lowest we've seen yet for a colour laser printer. The only major difference is that you can now add an external network adapter for $198.99, which brings the total cost up to the price of low-end colour lasers with built-in networking.
Like its predecessor, the 2500W is a GDI-based printer that depends on your PC to render the pages. It works only with Windows PCs, not Macs. The simple control panel has two buttons and several lights, including individual indicators for each toner. The single paper tray holds just 200 sheets or 10 envelopes. There's no manual bypass, so you have to swap paper in the tray to print on more than one type. Konica Minolta offers no additional paper-tray or duplexer options. The paper tray extends out the front of the printer, making the footprint larger than it looks. However, when you stash the paper in your desk and flip up the tray, the 2500W fits into a very small space.
The 2500W continues to produce higher-quality output than printers costing several times more. In our quality tests, it produced heavy-looking text, but with nice, sharp edges to the well-formed characters. Line art was also quite dark, though some of the closest parallel lines merged. Our greyscale print had a brown tint and was a little grainy, especially in lighter areas. On plain paper, our colour samples had natural colours and plenty of detail in the darkest areas, despite some posterisation (lack of smooth gradient). At its best quality setting on Konica Minolta-certified glossy paper made by NCR, photos had smooth tones, accurate colour, and good shadow detail. However, they looked a little grainy, with some dithering patterns visible in solids.
In our performance tests, the 2500W printed text at 13.9 pages per minute (ppm), colour on plain paper at 3.1ppm, and colour on glossy paper at 1.8ppm -- rates that are all close to average for the printers we've tested recently.
The printer comes with toner cartridges rated for just 1500 pages each. High-capacity replacement cartridges rated for 4500 pages cost $144.23 for black and $216.78 for each colour. In addition, the $212.19 drum cartridge has a lifetime of 45,000 black pages or 11,250 colour pages, bringing the estimated page cost to 2.1 cents for black and 5.2 cents for colour. Those costs are cheaper than the averages for the seven colour lasers we tested this month (September 2006) and very reasonable for a budget-priced printer.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Why won’t my printer connect to my wireless router?
- How 4D printing is now saving lives
- 3D printing industry to triple in four years to $21B
- Disney files patent for near instantaneous 3D printing
- Never run out of printer ink with HP Instant Ink
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- CCApplication PackagerVIC
- FTTechnical Consultant MS Dynamics AXQLD
- FTInformation Security ManagerNSW
- CCPeoplesoft SpecialistACT
- CCSAP UX ArchitectACT
- FTBusiness Intelligence ConsultantNSW
- FTITSM Project Manager - PERM ROLE !!!!!!ACT
- FTTechnical Consultant MS Dynamics AXSA
- CCMultiple Infrastructure ArchitectsWA
- CCSenior Full-stack .Net DeveloperNSW
- CCSCRUM MasterVIC
- FTProject Control AnalystSA
- FTSolutions Architect - Data Centre/ NetworkQLD
- TPPMO SchedulerNSW
- TPSenior Test Analyst - TAFEQLD
- FTLife/400 Developers / Programmers - Permanent - North Ryde areaNSW
- FTSenior Project Manager - Permanent OpportunityNSW
- CCSenior Project Manager - Vendor Transition - ApplicationsNSW
- CCJava Developer/ Guidewire Developers - Brisbane basedNSW
- CCMicrosoft Devops Engineers - contract - SydneyNSW
- FTTechnical Account ManagerVIC
- CCChange Manager l Port Macquarie NSWQLD
- FTSAP BW ConsultantACT
- CCSenior Business AnalystSA