Kodak EasyShare M320 digital compact camera
A budget 9.2-megapixel compact camera with average features
- Good picture quality for the asking price, compact & attractive design
- Horrific mode dial, poor noise-reduction, scant feature set
Kodak EasyShare M320 is a reliable budget camera that performs ably in most areas. While its picture quality and control scheme aren't perfect, its target audience of novice users will remain satisfied.
Price$ 199.00 (AUD)
The Kodak EasyShare M320 is an entry-level compact camera that has been designed for basic point-and-shoot situations. It comes equipped with a 9.2-megapixel CCD sensor, a 3x optical zoom lens and a small handful of consumer-friendly features.
There’s nothing remotely remarkable about the Kodak EasyShare M320 digital camera: it’s reasonably stylish, takes reasonable looking photos and is reasonably priced. Despite suffering from an off-putting control scheme — including the mode dial from hell — it remains an acceptable proposition for cash-strapped shoppers.
The Kodak EasyShare M320 isn’t a bad looking digital camera for the asking price. Its design is reminiscent of the Kodak EasyShare M1033, including the same el-cheapo sticker with marketing highlights in the left-hand corner (thankfully, this can be removed). Its dimensions of 97.2×59.7×21mm are around average for a camera in this price bracket — while it won’t make strangers coo excitedly in the street, it will still fit comfortably into your pocket. The black-and-silver colour scheme may be a bit predictable, but it remains attractive enough. For $199, there isn’t much to complain about.
Much the same thing can be said of the Kodak EasyShare M320’s image quality. While its output was far from perfect, it remains perfectly acceptable for a sub-$200 compact camera. Incidentally, don’t let the 9.2-megapixel sensor put you off — when it comes to cheap point-and-shoot cameras, a higher pixel count isn’t always the boon it appears to be (don't be fooled by marketing buzz).
The key to taking good pictures with the Kodak EasyShare M320 is — surprise, surprise — to shoot in well-lit environments. This will help keep the ISO sensitivity down and the shutter speed up, resulting in cleaner, blur-free photos. We found that noise became problematic at ISO 400 and above, which pretty much rules the M320 out as a nocturnal shooter. Colours were a little on the warm side, but the effect is not displeasing, with photos looking more vibrant as a result. Although there was noticeable feathering around the edges of images, this really only stood out when our photos were blown out to full size. If you stick to small-to-medium sized prints and social networking sites, the Kodak EasyShare M320 will be an reliable performer.
Like most budget-level cameras, the Kodak EasyShare M320 suffers from so-so build quality and a shoddy user-interface. By far the worst offender is the mode dial on top of the camera — it’s simply too small and narrow to operate effectively. Our fingers continually slipped off its surface during operation, leading to much frustration (if your mits are sweaty or overly large, you can basically forget about it). To make matters worse, the dial cannot be rotated 360 degrees, which means you’re forced to backtrack through every mode if you want to get from movie mode to ISO, or vice versa. This swiftly becomes a grim undertaking, but if you rarely venture beyond the auto mode it probably won't affect you.
Despite benefiting from a large and responsive directional pad, the menu interface also had its fair share of problems. The opaque menu tables were difficult to read in sunny environments, and we often found ourselves in the wrong subsection. Admittedly, these issues are easily overcome with a bit of shade and practice, but it remains a sticking point nonetheless. Considering how sparse the menu is, you’d think it would be much easier to navigate.
Curiously, the Kodak EasyShare M320’s battery compartment and SD-card slot are located in the side of the camera, instead of underneath as is more typical. If you’re an avid tripod user, this could come in handy, as it means you can swap over batteries and memory cards without detaching the camera from its perch.
The Kodak EasyShare M320 digital camera doesn't have any dedicated manual features to play around with. Instead, it relies on 17 scene presets that run the gamut from beach to fireworks settings. Exposure metering, adjustable white balance and a range of ISO sensitivities are also offered, although we imagine most users will want to stick to the auto settings. As with any camera worth its salt, the EasyShare M320 also comes with face detection, which gave a reliable performance in our tests.
When you boil it down, the Kodak EasyShare M320 is an average yet reliable compact camera that is slightly let down by a fiddly control scheme. There are plenty of worse entry-level cameras on the market, but there are also several better offerings, including the feature-packed Samsung ES55.
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 2 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 3 Parrot Mambo Drone review
- 4 Evapolar USB air conditioner review
- 5 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
Latest News Articles
- Boom: SanDisk just dropped the world's largest SD card
- Camera app makers tap into RAW power with iOS, and look forward to dual lenses
- Google Camera 3.2 lets you snap pictures while recording video
- CES 2016: Top 10 trends
- Sony α7S II aimed film-makers and low light photographers
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- TV buying guide: What to look for when buying a TV in 2016
- Best iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus plans: Optus vs Telstra vs Vodafone vs Virgin
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- FTProduct ManagerVIC
- CCContract Systems Analyst (JAVA/J2EE/Web) 161014/SA/922Asia
- FTSenior Architect, Markets and ProductsNSW
- CCSAP Finance Business AnalystNSW
- CCContract IT Assistant (PC LAN Support) 161017/ITA/742Asia
- CCPOS EngineerNSW
- CCSiebel DeveloperACT
- FTDirector Data AnalyticsACT
- CCContract Junior Programmer (JAVA/SQL) 161013/JP/602Asia
- FTSenior Architect | Perl | Linux |MySQL | Infrastructure | TelecomNSW
- CCDesktop Support AnalystNSW
- FTSolution ArchitectACT
- CCService Desk ConsultantTAS
- CCProject SchedulerVIC
- CCContract Systems Analyst (Oracle/Unix/WebLogic) 161020/SA/693Asia
- CCPHP DeveloperNSW
- FTWeb DeveloperNSW
- CCSAP FunctionalistACT
- FTSenior Analyst ProgrammerNSW
- CCEnterprise ArchitectNSW
- CCSenior Procurement SpecialistVIC
- FTSenior Front End DeveloperNSW
- CCSAP Release & Deployment ManagerNSW
- CCHead of Digital (Technology Manager - Digital Transformations)NSW