Shank on the Xbox 360 is a delightfully brutal action packed hack-and-slash video game
- Excellent 2D animation, decently challenging single-player campaign, deliciously violent combat, narrative is a good mix of serious and ridiculous, although the dialogue can get pretty cheesy
- Irritating control issues, completely uneven boss battles, somewhat short on features and content, two-player co-op makes all the game's little technical flaws stand out like a huge sore thumb.
A delightfully brutal and expertly animated hack-n-slasher, Shank is an action-packed experience, but still suffers from irritating control issues and a short playtime.
Best Deals (Selling at 3 stores)
Games like Shank don't come around often enough. Sometimes, violence for the pure sake of violence makes a great way to pass an afternoon, and Klei Entertainment's Shank will easily burn a few hours off an idle day. As a pure hack-and-slash experience, this game offers exactly what it promises, and although it suffers from some irritating design flaws, you can't really argue with a game that lets you run a chainsaw through an evil pro wrestler's sternum.
Shank, the titular hero of the game, wouldn't be out of place in a bar fight with Kratos. He bludgeons, bleeds, and bashes his enemies to death without breaking much of a sweat, furled by a thirst for revenge against the people who killed his girlfriend. Where the God of War carries a utility belt full of mythical artifacts, Shank gets by on more practical weapons like knives, grenades, machine guns, chains, and machetes. Each armament in Shank's artillery is fun to use, and the game does a good job of continually mixing things up level after level. Just when you start to tire of your standard pistols, a shotgun or katana drops into your lap at the just the right time.
However, the real trick is using all the different weapons together in proper sync. Personally, I found the chainsaw and shotgun to be the best combination for most encounters -- and the best way to overcome Shank’s somewhat sloppy hit detection. Given that the game is a 2D hack-and-slash title, I expect a certain amount of hiccups in the combat, but Shank thankfully keeps things tight enough that I don’t feel terribly cheated when unexpectedly ploughed over by the oversized enemies.
Shank's outrageous boss battles are where the game really shines: they're huge, difficult, and require a surprising amount of strategy. Even after repeatedly dying at the hands of the behemoth bosses, I didn't really mind biting the big one, since I was actually having fun trying out different tactics for each encounter -- violent animations and gruesome quick-time events make even the losing battles really enjoyable experiences.
Still, it's a little telling that Shank favours style and flashy action over fine-tuning. Huge enemies will barrel roll right at you in tight corridors to cheaply whittle down your health, while minor foes are easily dispatched by standing on the opposite side of the screen and letting loose with your gun of choice. Even worse, trying to save health items (beer) until you really need them is near impossible since you pick up items with the melee button. So, if you're in the middle of ten vicious gang members and you accidentally stray too far to one side of the screen, you'll often waste a precious beer on a full health bar.
In the single-player game, all these minor annoyances aren't much of a problem. It only takes a level or two before you're able to work around the rough edges and slay evil gang members without making critical mistakes. But in the two-player co-op mode, every small problem becomes a massive obstacle. Sadly, this effects the boss battles the most -- even on "Normal," they're insanely cheap, with the game barely providing you any room to dodge or anticipate attacks. Even worse, it seems like these fights are balanced with the game assuming that both players are dedicated experts. But if one of you isn't up to the task, you'll be on the receiving end of several hopeless (and frustrating) beatdowns.
But overall, Shank is nonetheless entertaining throughout. With dialogue and voice acting that tries way too hard to be serious and gritty, the whole thing comes off as B-movie camp, which makes the protagonist's story (and the co-op prequel) much easier to enjoy. In particular, I really appreciated Shank's art style -- the animation and character design are top notch, and could easily be used to produce a standalone TV or Internet series. Although the solo game is incredibly short (I finished it in 3 hours flat), the co-op is so difficult that you'll probably get your money's worth just by grinding through the murderously unfair bosses.
Despite my gripes, Shank is a badass game. It could've done with a little more content (maybe a boss rush mode?), but it's a hack-and-slash murderfest that can easily stand toe-to-toe with the likes of Castle Crashers and Scott Pilgrim.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 2 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 3 Parrot Mambo Drone review
- 4 Evapolar USB air conditioner review
- 5 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
Latest News Articles
- This week in games: Diablo 4 whispers, Civilization VI launch
- The Nintendo Switch is a radical mash-up of consoles and gaming handhelds
- Tobii's new eye tracker adds head tracking with an emphasis on PC games
- Halo Wars 2 hands-on preview: Blitz mode's thrilling twists could trigger an RTS revival
- The Xbox One's first email app is here, and it's not Outlook
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- TV buying guide: What to look for when buying a TV in 2016
- Best iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus plans: Optus vs Telstra vs Vodafone vs Virgin
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- CCPOS EngineerNSW
- CCResident Operation Support Engineer (Renewable Contract)Asia
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW
- CCApplication Support DeveloperVIC
- CCJunior Programmer (Application Dev. & Mgt.) 161017/JP/221Asia
- CC.Net Sitecore DeveloperVIC
- FTSolution Delivery ManagerVIC
- CCTechnology Training ManagerNSW
- CCContract Senior Systems Analyst (Oracle/SSADM) 161027/SSA/634Asia
- FTProduct ManagerVIC
- CCSenior Systems Engineer - Canberra roleNSW
- CCInfrastructure & Security Solution ArchitectVIC
- FTData Governance Project Manager | 6 month ContractNSW
- CCNetwork AdministratorVIC
- FTSenior .Net Software EngineerVIC
- FTCustomer Solutions Engineer | Voice | Data | TelcoNSW
- CCSenior Java Developer-Java SE 8, HTTP APIs, Protocol BuffersNSW
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (HTML/JAVA/J2EE) 161025/AP/862Asia
- FTLevel 2 Application SupportVIC
- CCSenior Web DeveloperNSW
- CCSenior Full Stack Java DeveloperNSW
- CCSenior Siebel AnalystACT