JVC GC-FM1 HD pocket camcorder
The GC-FM1 HD shoots great bright-light video, but is hampered by its build, finicky controls and execution of marquee features
- Excellent video in optimum lighting, good 4x digital zoom and macro mode
- Poor low-light performance, cheap plastic finish, too expensive for what it offers
The JVC GC-FM1 HD pocket camcorder shoots some of the best bright-light video we've seen, but it's hampered by its plastic build, its finicky controls, and the execution of its marquee features.
Price$ 299.00 (AUD)
But pocket-camcorder championships aren't won on paper.
Like the Zi8, the GC-FM1 shoots 1080p video and offers digital image stabilisation, two positive distinguishing factors in the now-crowded HD pocket camcorder market. And just as the Zi8 does, this JVC pocket camcorder has a landscape/macro toggle, the ability to shoot still photos (8 megapixels, versus the Zi8's 5-megapixel sensor), an HDMI-out port for viewing footage on an HDTV (no HDMI cable is included, however), and an SDHC card slot for storing videos and still images.
However, the GC-FM1's feature set is much better in theory than it is in practice. Since this device has no flip-out USB connector, you have to offload clips and images to your PC via an included USB cable. It also falls short of its pint-size competitors in usability, durability, audio quality, and controls -- and that's frustrating, because JVC's first pocket camcorder shoots some of the best-quality bright-light video we've seen to date.
In head-to-head video tests with competing pocket camcorders, the JVC GC-FM1 turned in above-average footage in well-lit situations. It showed better highlight definition than the Kodak Zi8 and the Flip Video MinoHD -- two of the best pocket camcorders we've tested in terms of video quality -- and its video looked a bit sharper than clips shot with the second-generation MinoHD.
Colors looked more muted and less vibrant than in footage from the Zi8 and MinoHD, and the MinoHD seemed to capture video with smoother motion. All in all, the JVC GC-FM1 earned a video-quality score of Very Good in comparison with the pocket-camcorder competition.
The JVC GC-FM1 shoots .mov files at about 88GB per minute of footage.
Unfortunately, footage shot in low light with the JVC GC-FM1 is another story entirely. The GC-FM1 received a low-light score of Fair, clearly outmatched by the low-light footage that the second-generation Flip Video MinoHD produced.
Even if you're willing to sacrifice low-light video quality for the sake of the GC-FM1's much-better bright-light footage, this pocket camcorder has a handful of disappointing drawbacks. A big one is the audio quality: The on-board microphone picked up a lot of hiss in our test footage, making the audio tracks for clips sound as if they were being played back on a cassette deck.
I also didn't have much luck with the GC-FM1's digital image stabilisation feature. If it worked at all, it did so only with the slightest of movements; still photos taken while I slowly moved the camcorder from side to side came out blurry.
And when you use the GC-FM1 in still-photo mode, it offers no "click" noise or any visual indication that you've captured a photo. The screen simply blinks a bit, and you don't see a preview of the image you've just shot unless you dive into the playback menus and scroll down to find it.
Perhaps the main drawback is the build quality of the device itself. The JVC GC-FM1's flashy, reflective faceplate, ribbed silver edges, and colorful back panel are all made of very lightweight plastic, and the entire device feels too light and fragile to be durable. The buttons on the back are all plastic, as well, and they're too small for anything but the smallest hands to use effectively. You get a power button, a playback button, a delete button, a still/video toggle, a menu button, and a four-way navigation pad/record button that also controls the GC-FM1's 4X digital zoom.
The power button is not very responsive; I had to hold it down for a few seconds or press it more than once to turn on the device. The menu button isn't entirely useful, either: It works only when you hold down the delete button while pressing it.
On top of that, the menu options are surprisingly limited. You can adjust the time display, toggle between the PAL and NTSC formats for video-out, check your firmware version, or format your SDHC card -- and that's it. You get none of the frame-rate controls or other tweakable settings that you do on the Kodak Zi8.
On a bright note, the 4X digital zoom worked smoothly, and full-zoom footage looked notably better than what we've seen from the half-baked digital zooms on nearly all other pocket camcorders. The landscape/macro toggle on the left side of the camcorder also worked fairly well, and the macro mode worked at a slightly closer distance from the subject than did the macro mode on the Zi8.
All in all, the JVC GC-FM1 costs too much to recommend, considering its shortcomings compared with the Kodak Zi8. Its video quality in good lighting is among the best we've seen, and its highlight definition is a strong suit. However, the build quality, buttons, audio quality, and controls all detract from the device's usability, and the 1080p-shooting Zi8 allows much greater flexibility with your video.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- AT&T will acquire Time Warner for US$85.4b in content play
- Facebook adds Apple TV and Chromecast support as video push ramps up
- Remocam review: This security camera can control your home appliances
- Logitech's C922 webcam is the revered C920's vastly upgraded successor
- Jump the line for the newest Chromecast features with Google's new preview program
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- CCERP LeadWA
- FTPerformance TesterNSW
- CCApplication Specialist (Cerner) - Brisbane BasedNSW
- TPMicrosoft Dynamics CRM Developer/ AdministratorWA
- FTBusiness Development Manager | Digital MarketNSW
- FTMotor Claims ConsultantNSW
- FTSystems Engineer - Managed Service ProviderVIC
- CCService Desk Quality Assurance SpecialistNSW
- CCMedical Imaging Solution ArchitectQLD
- CCSenior Networks EngineerVIC
- FTSenior UX DesignerVIC
- FTSite Acquisition ManagerSA
- CCData Surveyor, Data Analyst, Electrical backgroundACT
- CCWindows 365 Engineer - start ASAPNSW
- TPPHP Programmer - SeniorQLD
- TPSharePoint DeveloperACT
- FTTechnical Writer - HealthcareVIC
- FTICT Business Liaison ManagerSA
- FTIT Systems AnalystVIC
- CCSenior Integration DeveloperOther
- TPSenior System Engineer - WintelVIC
- FTIdentity Management Team LeaderVIC
- CCSenior Platform DeveloperNSW
- FTFront End DeveloperVIC
- TPBusiness Analyst - RoboticsNSW