iRobot Scooba 385 floor-washing robot
The iRobot Scooba floor-washing machine is a robotic mop that takes the hassle out of an almost always neglected household chore
- Cleans well, easy to take apart and clean, mops the floor for you!
- Very loud, soap is not sold in Australia, expensive
The iRobot Scooba 385 floor-washing machine delivered good results during our tests. It is painfully loud, but it's probably not as painful as actually mopping floors yourself. It also uses considerably less water than conventional mopping.
Price$ 849.00 (AUD)
If you're not a fan of vacuuming, then surely you would have to agree that its uglier brute of a cousin, mopping, is even less enjoyable. Thankfully the iRobot Roomba robot vacuum cleaner has an equally helpful floor-cleaning counterpart: the Scooba 385.
iRobot Scooba 385: First impressions
After un-boxing the Scooba 385, it is crucial that you read the instructions before you use it. The battery needs to be charged for a full 12 hours prior to use and you should never leave the battery stored inside the unit. Furthermore, the Scooba 385 does not require a floor cleaning solution at all. If you put any floor-cleaning detergent in the Scooba 385 it will likely destroy the unit and the 12-month warranty will be voided. iRobot soap for the Scooba 385 is only sold in the US, but 100ml of white vinegar or a pinch of bi-carb soda dissolved in cold or warm water will do the trick (it's better for the environment too!)
After charging the battery for the suggested time, we placed it in the unit and were ready to get cleaning! A removable water tank for the Scooba 385 has two compartments — one side is for clean water, the other is for dirty water which gets sucked up off the floor. We poured 100ml of white vinegar into the detachable water chamber, filled it to maximum capacity with warm water, and slotted it back into the Scooba 385. We then pressed the power button and discovered the Scooba 385's worst trait: how loud it is! In our tests, it was much louder than the Roomba 577 and Roomba 530 combined; we found ourselves almost having to yell at one another in order to communicate while the Scooba 385 was cleaning. Nevertheless, the iRobot Scooba 385 wasted no time in getting on with the job of cleaning the floor.
iRobot Scooba 385: Performance
We found the Scooba 385 to be highly efficient at mopping the floor. According to iRobot, one full tank can wash up to 425 square feet (around 40 square metres) before it requires refilling. We didn't have an area quite that big to test it in, but we can tell you that one tank allowed the Scooba 385 to do a thorough clean of our kitchen and dining areas (approximately 30 square metres), going over the same spots multiple times, resulting in a great overall clean.
A four-stage cleaning process takes place as the Scooba makes its rounds: it preps (picks up dirt and debris), washes, scrubs and dries.
Just like the Roomba 577 and Roomba 530, the Scooba 385 is fitted with bumper and cliff sensors to ensure it doesn't ram into things or tumble down stairs or ledges. When it encounters an obstacle, the Scooba 385 slows down and manoeuvres away from the object or carefully navigates around the edges of the obstacle.
At the end of the cleaning cycle, we removed the tank from the unit and emptied out the dirty water, then gave the whole unit a quick clean. Maintaining the Scooba 385 is easy. Components slide out easily and pretty much just need a quick rinse. Once we put all the pieces back into the Scooba 385, we pushed the power button twice to activate the unit's self-drying mode. The Scooba 385 sucks in air to assist in the drying process; once it's dry, the battery can be removed and stored back in its box.
iRobot Scooba 385: Cleaning results
We were very impressed with the results the Scooba 385 gave us. The tiled floors we tested it on were noticeably cleaner after the 385 finished. If the noise really gets to you, then you can program the Scooba to undertake its cleaning cycle while you're not at home. According to iRobot the Scooba can clean up to 79 square meters (four average size rooms) on a single battery charge so you could get the groceries done (something robot's can't do — yet) and come home to cleaned floors!
Become a fan of GoodGearGuide on Facebook
Follow GoodGearGuide on Twitter: @GoodGearGuide
Stay up to date with the latest reviews. Sign up to GoodGearGuide’s Gear Daily newsletters
Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Sony Xperia Z3 review: The no-frills flagship
- 2 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note 4 review: The busiest, biggest and best Samsung phablet
- 4 Aldi's $279 Bauhn Sphere review: Disappointing
- 5 Nokia Lumia 735 review: Perfectly ordinary
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- Study: E-readers, tablets can disrupt sleep
- Google's prototype car ready, but it's more VW Beetle than Porsche
- Hotel group asks FCC for permission to block some outside Wi-Fi
- North Korean Internet connection hit by outages
- DirecTV won't show 'The Interview,' others won't say
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.