HP Photosmart C6280

Affordable photo printing

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 5
HP Photosmart C6280
  • HP Photosmart C6280
  • HP Photosmart C6280
  • HP Photosmart C6280

Pros

  • 'Scan to' feature, inexpensive consumables

Cons

  • Quality inconsistent

Bottom Line

The latest addition to HP’s Photosmart line-up, the C6280 is a capable multi-function for families and home users. However, it has quality issues and lacks CD/DVD printing.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 5 stores)

See all prices

HP's Photosmart C6280 is a capable multi-function solution designed primarily for families. While this multi-function boasts a number of features that facilitate use around the home, it also suffers from inconsistent quality.

The unit has a multi-card reader capable of reading CompactFlash, SD, MMC, XD and MemoryStick. A lack of an extra USB connection prohibits users from plugging in PictBridge-capable digital cameras and mobile phones, though this shouldn't be too much of an issue.

The presence of an Ethernet port allows the printer to be shared on a home network. There are also quite a few PC-less features, such as photo reprinting and direct scanning. A 'Scan to' allows users to choose which computer to scan to over a network or local connection. Given the C6280's position in HP's range, we were surprised to find no direct CD/DVD label printing option.

Printing speeds were adequate. Using the 'fast draft' quality setting, the C6280 managed to print normal text documents at 20 pages per minute, slightly faster than the business-focused Officejet J6480 All-in-One . This speed slowed to 6.8ppm at normal quality; an average speed in the mid-range multi-function market. Text documents with graphical elements slowed slightly at normal quality, managing 4ppm. These speeds indicate that the multi-function has an average print speed and should meet the requirements of most families and home users.

We weren't overly impressed with printing quality. Text was fairly unclear at all quality settings when printed on a white background. This improved somewhat when printing text with graphical elements, though this may be because of the text's imperfections being masked by a colour background. While the C6280 isn't necessarily designated for text printing, a printer designed for the home should be able to print decent quality text documents for use at work or school.

Quality and speed were both quite inconsistent during our photo printing tests. On normal quality setting, 4x6in photos printed in 1min12sec, whereas best quality 4x6in photos actually printed faster, averaging 50sec. Banding and odd contrast results appeared inconsistently, mainly when using the C6280's PC-less printing feature or when printing at normal quality.

When printing from the computer at best quality, results were significantly better. In 4x6in photos, lines were distinct and blacks quite defined. There was no sign of banding, though reds seemed a little indistinct, causing flesh tones to be slightly unrealistic. Unfortunately, when printing A4 photos the C6280 loses quite a bit of black definition, and the overall picture is much more washed-out than 4x6in photos. A4 photos exaggerate this printer's shortcomings, and the quality in 4x6in photos should suffice for the average user.

Scanning quality was adequate. Our scanning tests revealed that the C6280 managed to produce an image with balanced colour. In comparison to the Canon PIXMA MP970, the C6280 didn't possess the same vibrancy but managed to produce a greater amount of detail as a result. The ability to scan up to a resolution of 4800dpi allows the C6280 to scan images at a reasonably high quality.

The C6280 manages a cost per page of 30c, which is cheap enough for common usage. When compared to the 32.8c/page of the Officejet J6480 All-in-One , it is clear that the C6280 and its six-ink system doesn't necessarily provide too much in the way of cost savings. Nevertheless, when consumable costs are an important factor in the decision, the C6280's cheaper running costs are an advantage.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
Use WhistleOut's technology to compare:
Mobile phone plans & deals
Mobile phone models
Mobile phone carriers
Broadband plans & deals
Broadband providers
Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?