Gigabyte Radeon HD 2600 XT (GV-RX26T256H)
- Silent, stable with only a passive cooler
- Performance; not for enthusiasts
Gigabyte has done a great job of making this card run silent. It's not a high-end gaming card, but it will suit those who wish to build a media centre and still hope to play some games.
Price$ 209.00 (AUD)
Best Deals (Selling at 1 store)
- Oz Stock Vcg-r927xoc-2gd Pn: Gv-r927xoc-2gd, Gi... 305.05
Gigabyte is infamous for adding a few of its own touches before releasing a product, and the Gigabyte Radeon HD2600 XT is no exception. As with many of Gigabyte's low-mid range cards, a silent, passive cooler has been installed, keeping the system quiet, while still maintaining a good thermal balance for stable operation.
The Radeon HD2600 XT is second only to the Radeon HD2900 XT, at least within ATI's own range, and isn't a high-end gaming card by any means. Certainly it can hold its own, especially in titles released last year and earlier, but don't expect to get playable frame rates in the latest gaming titles with the best quality settings. What the HD2600 XT does offer is a good mid-range experience with benefits for HD video decoding and HD (HDCP) video output via HDMI (an optional adapter is required).
Built onto the board is a dedicated chip called the universal video decoder (UVD), which is designed to handle the decoding of movies, especially high-definition movies such as Blu-ray or HD-DVD, rather than offload that task to the CPU. This is especially handy for low-end computers, which need to reserve the CPU for other tasks.
As is mentioned above, the Gigabyte HD2600 XT is made specifically to output via HDMI. Included in the sales package is a DVI to HDMI adapter. Radeon cards from the HD2000 series also support audio throughput via the DVI/HDMI output, so it's possible to connect your PC or media centre using this card to any standard HDMI capable TV or home theatre and get digital video and audio throughput.
In our benchmarks we saw expectedly average results across the DirectX 10 games and playable, but still not excellent, results from the DirectX 9-based games. In 3DMark 2006 at the default settings it scored 4879, while at 1920x1200 using 8x antialiasing (AA) and 16x anisotropic filtering (AF) it only scored 929. In FEAR it averaged only 18fps (frames per second) using the maximum quality settings at a resolution of 1600x1200 and in Half-Life 2 using the maximum quality settings at 1920x1200 it averaged 70fps.
In the Call of Juarez DirectX 10 demo it averaged just 8.9fps and in Lost Planet: Extreme Condition DirectX 10 version, with all DirectX 10 features turned on at a resolution of 1920x1200 it averaged just 5.7fps.
It's not surprising that the results aren't very high. This card only offers 256MB of GDDR3 memory with a 128-bit memory bus. It has a 120 stream processors as opposed to the 320 on the Radeon HD2900 XT, the core clock runs at 800MHz while its RAM runs at 1400MHz.
During the tests we checked the temperature of the large black heat sink that Gigabyte has placed on the card and it maxed out at around 47 degrees. At no point did the card falter due to heat and it remained blissfully quiet the whole time.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) review: Raising the bar
- 2 Xiaomi Mi4 review: Xiaomi's best yet
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note Edge review: Lightly flawed, Undeniably special
- 4 Sony Xperia Z3 review: The no-frills flagship
- 5 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- Google Now adds data from Lyft, Airbnb and many more apps
- Outlook app for Android and iOS boosts Microsoft's mobile comeback
- MIT randomizes tasks to speed massive multicore processors
- NEC aims at Big Data 'sweet spot' with new SAP Hana tool
- Uber will fight to keep its Boston ride data private
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.