Gigabyte GeForce 8500 GT TurboForce Ultra Edition (GV-NX85T256HP)
- Factory overclocked, the fan only spins when running a game
- Not for high-end gamers
This is a solid low end card made to function at a higher level. It's quiet and powerful enough for casual gamers to have a bit of fun.
Best Deals (Selling at 20 stores)
The ominous blue board on any Gigabyte product is a sure sign that Gigabyte has taken the standard reference and added its own tweaks. In the case of this Gigabyte GeForce 8500 GT TurboForce Ultra edition, Gigabyte has opted to add its own fancy heat sink and cranked up the clock speeds significantly to give this card a fair boost to its performance.
With a suffix like "TurboForce Ultra edition" you'd expect there to be a significant difference and there is. The standard clock speeds of the NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT are 450MHz for the Core and 400MHz (800MHz effective) for the memory clock. On the TurboForce Ultra edition it has been cranked up to 600MHz for the core clock speed and 700MHz for the memory. It also uses solid capacitors only, which, according to Gigabyte, are more efficient and last longer.
Presumably to counter the added heat imposed by this factory overclocking, the Gigabyte board has a large, elaborate cooler that is painted gold and looks like some kind of Imperial regalia. The cooler is not entirely passive, a small fan spins away to help manage the temperature, but only seems to kick in when the card is actually running a game. Therefore the card is reasonably quiet when the system is idle or under a minimal workload.
Beyond the clock speeds and the all-solid capacitor board, this card offers the same specifications as other GeForce 8500 GT cards. It has 16 stream processors, 256MB of GDDR3 RAM and a 128-bit memory bus. Standard 8500 GT cards produce throughput of 12.8GBps, while this card reaches a theoretical maximum of 22.4GBps.
In our benchmarks we saw typically low results, though casual gamers who don't expect the best quality settings from their games will still enjoy this card's performance. In FEAR we only got playable results using the maximum quality settings, but a resolution of only 1024x768, in which it averaged 39fps (frames per second). In Half-Life 2 we saw an average of 48fps using the maximum quality settings at a resolution of 1920x1200.
In the Lost Planet: Extreme Condition DirectX 10 version we saw an average of 69fps using the default settings. Using a resolution of 1920x1200 and with all the DirectX 10 settings turned on, the frame rate dropped to a meagre 5.2fps. In the Call of Juarez DirectX 10 demo using the default settings, it averaged only 6fps. Dropping the settings to 1024x768 and using the low quality options achieved just 18.7fps.
The card also ships with Dawn of War: Dark Crusade, an excellent real-time strategy game that's worth a few hours of fun.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) review: Raising the bar
- 2 Xiaomi Mi4 review: Xiaomi's best yet
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note Edge review: Lightly flawed, Undeniably special
- 4 Sony Xperia Z3 review: The no-frills flagship
- 5 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- FTC calls on IoT vendors to protect privacy
- Apple tops Chinese smartphone market for the first time
- DNS hijacking vulnerability affects D-Link DSL router, possibly other devices
- Mobile World Congress rumor mill churns with reports of better screens, cameras
- Privacy tsar to EC: Wrap up EU-US data exchange talks quickly or else
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.