Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd
- 12x zoom, low chromatic aberration
- Over-sharpened pictures, slow, no image stabilisation
FujiFilm's FinePix S1000fd is a decent ultra-zoom with a small body, but its lack of image stabilisation makes the large lens much less useful and the sluggish performance will irritate many users.
Price$ 399.00 (AUD)
With its 12x optical zoom and 10-megapixel sensor, FujiFilm's FinePix S1000fd is relatively powerful but it lacks a few essentials — such as optical image stabilisation. This makes it difficult to take full advantage of the long lens.
12x is about middle of the range for a large zoom camera, but considering the relatively small build of this unit it is quite impressive. The problem lies in the fact that you'll never capture a useable shot at maximum zoom without some kind of optical stabilisation. The S1000fd does include some basic stabilisation, but it just works by adjusting the ISO sensitivity and doesn't do a particularly good job of compensating for shaking hands. We tried snapping some shots at 12x magnification, but without a tripod it just wasn't worth going over 4x or 5x.
Our test shots were fairly good, with some niggling issues that may annoy image quality purists. The biggest problem was some notable over-sharpening; our shots were clear and sharp with well-rendered detail and crisp edges, but at times they were too crisp. This made everything look somewhat cut-out and unrealistic. It wasn't problematic at small print sizes but was noticeable at larger magnifications.
Fortunately, chromatic aberration was almost non-existent, which is extremely pleasing considering the size and complexity of the lens. There was no haloing on our indoor high-contrast charts and minimal detail loss towards the corners of the frame. Colours were typical for a consumer-oriented camera, with brightly saturated primary colours, most notably reds and blues. Unfortunately, there is no way to adjust colour saturation in the menus, so you'll need to do some tweaking in post processing if you're unsatisfied with the default balance.
Noise performance was also disappointing. Even at ISO 200 there were signs of speckling, and by ISO 400 our shots had a noticeable white graininess to them; this was visible even at small print sizes. Anything above that is basically unusable, which really cuts down on your shooting options.
The speed of this unit was less than impressive. Its start-up time was sluggish at 2.3sec, but this is standard for an ultra-zoom. What was less expected was the 0.2-0.25sec shutter lag and the 3.1sec shot-to-shot time, both of which are extremely slow. The burst mode was also a touch leisurely at 2.2 frames per second.
The camera has some advanced features, including full manual shooting modes, but it lacks the options more advanced photographers will want. These include things like onboard colour, contrast and sharpness adjustment, image stabilisation and RAW shooting. There are some basics like Face Detect and a nifty panorama mode, but we'd have liked to see the features more fleshed out.
We liked the construction of the S1000fd. It has an extremely heavy, sturdy body and a large rubber grip. It is comfortable to hold yet still somewhat compact for an ultra-zoom. The interface is a little confusing. It isn't nearly as streamlined as the menu system found on some competing products, but it does the job.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Boom: SanDisk just dropped the world's largest SD card
- Camera app makers tap into RAW power with iOS, and look forward to dual lenses
- Google Camera 3.2 lets you snap pictures while recording video
- CES 2016: Top 10 trends
- Sony α7S II aimed film-makers and low light photographers
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- CCService Desk/Helpdesk ConsultantNSW
- CCDevOps EngineerWA
- FTTechnology Portfolio - Investment AnalystACT
- FTTraffic / Production ManagerNSW
- TPSenior Systems EngineerWA
- FTDevOps EngineerQLD
- CCData Surveyor, Data Analyst, Electrical backgroundACT
- FTBusiness Analyst (Payment Systems Project)QLD
- FTSoftware DeveloperWA
- FTFull Stack PHP DeveloperQLD
- CCVBA DeveloperNSW
- TPSenior Business AnalystQLD
- CCCloud Automation Engineer. Work Location - CanberraACT
- CCSolution ArchitectNSW
- TPProcurement Support AnalystNSW
- CCSenior Software EngineerACT
- CCSystems AdministratorQLD
- CCSAP CRM Technical LeadACT
- FTDesktop Support Team LeaderVIC
- CCTechnology Specialist-AWS MigrationNSW
- CCLead Systems EngineerNSW
- CCProcess Analysts, Wealth ManagementNSW
- FTWeb Developer/ DesignerACT
- FTEnterprise ArchitectACT
- FTTechnical Business AnalystQLD