Epson Stylus TX200

Surprising results from a budget multifunction.

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now
Epson Stylus TX200
  • Epson Stylus TX200
  • Epson Stylus TX200
  • Epson Stylus TX200

Pros

  • Fairly fast, decent quality photos, memory-card reader

Cons

  • Poor direct printing implementation, poor build quality

Bottom Line

At a bargain basement price the TX200 provides surprising quality and performance, making this multifunction hard to pass up. There are inherent flaws in such a cheap printer, but for families and occasional printing needs the TX200 is a decent purchase.

Would you buy this?

Nearing the cheaper end of Epson’s budget line of multifunctions, the Stylus TX200 is an extremely affordable printer which proved to be superior in performance and quality to the more expensive Stylus Office TX300F. Though there are still some negative aspects to this multifunction, it is certainly a decent option for consumers on a budget.

Bearing a striking resemblance to the Stylus CX5500, the TX200 improves on its predecessor with the addition of a memory-card reader for direct printing. Apart from this it carries the standard print, copy and scan functionality, and has a basic control panel. With no automatic document feeder or fax capability, the TX200 is clearly designed for home use.

Unsurprisingly, the TX200 still carries the hallmarks of Epson manufacturing that we dislike. Poor build quality means that most hinges and trays are easily breakable if anything more than gentle force is applied, while the rear paper feeder’s paper control mechanism caused numerous paper jams during testing. We’re not surprised to see this on the TX200, but we still dislike the lack of effort by Epson.

With support for SD, xD, CompactFlash and MemoryStick, and a PictBridge for compatible digital cameras, media support is fairly comprehensive. Unfortunately, its implementation is hardly satisfactory: like Epson’s Stylus CX7300, the TX200 lacks a colour LCD screen to display the photos available for print. Instead, direct printing requires users to print off an index sheet of the photos, mark their desired prints and then scan the sheet back into the printer. Although this is all done without help from a PC, the entire process is troublesome and ink-wasting. (Of course, the memory card reader can be used to view photos on a PC.)

Fortunately, there are plenty of positives. We were extremely surprised at the TX200’s performance during our printing tests, with speeds that easily surpassed the more expensive TX300F. A standard text document will print at an average 12 pages per minute using its draft quality setting, with the first page out in 9.3 seconds. At normal quality — with vastly superior output — this slowed to 4ppm. Documents with graphical elements were perplexingly faster, with draft quality documents printing at 19ppm, and normal quality documents slowing to 5ppm. Photo printing is also much faster, with a standard 4x6in photo taking a fairly quick 1min, and A4 photos printing in 3min 17sec. Though these speeds don’t rival laser printers or high-end inkjets, they remain surprisingly quick for the TX200’s price range and much faster than the Stylus Office TX300F.

Quality is adequate for the price, with surprisingly good quality photo prints. Text documents show no real aberrations, though the characters themselves are slightly bolder than they should be. Colours in graphical documents are somewhat dull when compared to the same results from the Stylus Office TX300F, but don’t impinge on the readability of the text itself. Photo printing was surprisingly accurate, with banding on A4 photos barely visible. Blacks are only slightly inaccurate, while most other colours are acceptably vibrant, which is particularly useful for outdoor photos.

Scanning quality is decent, with no significant loss of detail. Images are slightly under-saturated when compared to the original, though this wasn’t too much of an issue.

The TX200 has a total running cost of 19c per page, so it’s suitable as a low-cost family printer. Though some flaws have carried over from previous Epson models, the TX200’s performance and quality are significantly improved.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?