Epson Stylus Office TX300F

Slow printing but decent value for the home office.

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 7
Epson Stylus Office TX300F
  • Epson Stylus Office TX300F
  • Epson Stylus Office TX300F
  • Epson Stylus Office TX300F

Pros

  • Inexpensive, automatic document feeder

Cons

  • Poor build quality, no front paper output cassette, very slow printing speeds

Bottom Line

The Stylus Office TX300F is slow and poorly built, but for its price it’s certainly appealing. The unit provides a slight compromise between dirt cheap and acceptable quality, and the automatic document feeder is a welcome feature.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 7 stores)

See all prices

Targeted at the home office, Epson’s Stylus Office TX300F is a very affordable multifunction inkjet printer. At this price, don’t expect high quality or great performance, but it should meet the minimum requirements of the business-minded.

The TX300F provides fairly standard printing, copying and scanning capabilities, along with fax functions. The attached automatic document feeder makes it stand out for its price point, though this comes at the cost of the colour LCD and memory card reader found on the similarly priced TX400.

Although Epson’s naming conventions have changed, the hallmarks of the typical Epson printer clearly haven’t. The Stylus Office TX300F still bears the familiar control panel, the same ink cartridges, and, unfortunately, the same poor build quality. Take some care and the TX300F shouldn’t provide too many problems, but given that the multifunction is clearly destined for the home we would have preferred some measure of childproofing.

Though not as slow as the budget Stylus CX5500, its printing speed is still poor. While printing a standard text document at draft quality the TX300F managed 13.3 pages per minute, with the first page out in 9.2sec. When quality was bumped to normal, this speed dropped dramatically to 3.5ppm, though quality was much improved. Text documents with graphical elements printed at 7.4ppm in draft quality, with normal quality documents taking an average of 42sec to print. Photo printing is worse still, with normal quality 4x6in photos taking 4min 44secs to print, and A4 photos causing us to wait 11min 48sec. Though we don’t expect the photo printing capabilities of the TX300F to be particularly impressive, its document printing speeds are worryingly slow.

Unfortunately, slow performance doesn’t equal good quality results. As with most other Epson inkjet printers, draft quality delivers extremely faint and generally unreadable results. Under normal and best quality settings the output is largely comparable to the TX300F’s predecessor, the Stylus CX7300, with no visible aberrations in text documents. Text is surprisingly accurate for a printer at this price point, and colours are also of an acceptable quality for use in documents. This quality doesn’t translate to good photo printing though; photos suffer from poor colour accuracy and severe banding.

Scan quality is adequate, with results largely staying true to the source image. Results were slightly under-saturated in some of our tests, though there was no sacrifice in detail. Disappointingly, scanning must be initiated from a computer rather than from the TX300F itself, a feature we were expecting on a business-focussed multifunction.

The TX300F’s low initial outlay is accompanied by a relatively low consumable cost of 19c per page. Though the TX300F is slow and fairly mediocre in some respects, its price is a definite advantage for those who need a cheap home office multifunction.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest News Articles

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?