Epson Stylus CX5500

A budget multi-function with some flaws

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 5
Epson Stylus CX5500
  • Epson Stylus CX5500
  • Epson Stylus CX5500
  • Epson Stylus CX5500

Pros

  • Poor build quality, unimpressive printing quality

Cons

  • Cost efficient, decent scan quality

Bottom Line

Epson’s Stylus CX5500 carries a number of flaws which will deter some buyers. However, given its low price point and cost efficiency, this multi-function will suit those in need of a budget unit with cheap running costs.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 5 stores)

See all prices

The Stylus CX5500 is Epson's entry-level multi-function printer, offering basic functionality in an inexpensive package. Although its relatively low price point will inevitably entice buyers, potential users should be aware of its poor build quality and unimpressive performance.

Although the build quality of most Epson printers and multi-function units is questionable, this is particularly the case for the CX5500. The unit is constructed almost entirely of plastic and is bulky compared to competing units. Its sole paper feeder is found at the rear, making it difficult to adjust; the flimsy back support for media does little to change our opinion regarding build quality. Most moving parts feel as if they are on the verge of breaking, and everyday use of the machine around the home could easily lead to broken hinges. Although this can be attributed to the CX5500's price tag, there is a better-built alternative available: the Canon PIXMA MP210.

During testing, we found the CX5500's printing speeds to be largely unimpressive. Although draft quality text documents printed at 14 pages per minute, normal quality slowed output down to 2.8ppm. Text documents with graphical elements had significantly slower printing speeds, with the multi-function managing 6.7ppm at draft quality and 1.12ppm at normal quality. Speeds for 4x6in photos weren't fast either, with normal quality photos printing in 4min 27sec. Although we don't expect the CX5500 to meet the standards set by more expensive models, the stark difference in speed and quality between draft and normal settings is a big problem for this multi-function.

Print quality was adequate for a family-oriented printer. Although printed text documents were at points a little ragged, the text remained clear at all levels of quality. Draft quality documents are much lighter than documents printed at higher quality settings. Documents with graphical elements generally had clear text across all quality settings. However, colour reproduction was quite inaccurate, with best quality tests revealing washed-out colours that lacked intensity.

The same was true of photo printing tests. A red overtone is immediately noticeable in 4x6in and A4 photos. This lends well to flesh tones, but impacts harshly on blues and blacks. As a result, blacks and greys are poorly defined, and outdoor shots involving skies will inevitably carry a reddish hue. There is also some evidence of banding. This is particularly noticeable in A4 photos, but shouldn't be an issue for those who only want 4x6in photos.

Although the CX5500's 1200dpi scanning resolution is low in comparison to the 4800dpi typical of more expensive models, the lower resolution should be sufficient for everyday use. Scanning quality was adequate. As with many Epson multi-functions, the CX5500 exhibited a darker image in comparison to Canon products, which allows for a more realistic image. It can also result in a slight loss of detail in darker images, although the compromise is generally acceptable.

The CX5500's cost per page of 17c is excellent. In combination with its low initial price, this will easily convince some buyers. However, if you're looking for a long-term, budget multi-function there are better quality options than the CX5500.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Recommended

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?