Echologic 3.5in Digital Photo Frame
A little frame with sizeable issues
- Small form factor, rechargeable battery, good colour accuracy
- Paltry internal storage, mirrored frame is distracting, photos easily pixelated, inadequate viewing angles
Echologic’s 3.5in digital photo frame relies too much on its cute factor. It is let down by poor screen performance and inadequate internal storage, making it an underwhelming product.
Price$ 79.00 (AUD)
Echologic's latest digital photo frame is the second-smallest we've seen, beaten only by Kaiser Baas' 1.5in photo frame. At 3.5in, it's more of a tiny photo frame than a keyring accessory, fitting into a market smaller than a midget submarine. It's competitively priced and should be suitable for those who want a portable photo frame for travelling.
The device has smooth, black rubberised plastic on the back; the LCD itself is surrounded by a silver mirrored frame (which distracts somewhat from the photos themselves). A multi-card reader on the side supports SD and MMC cards, while a mini-USB port allows for a PC connection. The frame even has a small stand for those times when you just need to gather around a tiny screen with 15 of your closest friends and watch the good times roll.
Don't expect to fit too much on the frame's internal memory — the device has a measly 1.5MB of internal storage. Thankfully, the frame's rechargeable battery is more than up to the task of powering the device and displaying photos for a few hours.
Options aren't abundant on the device, but it does offer basic configuration. A menu allows users to change the displayed image size, language and power saving settings, as well as configure slideshow transition and speed settings, and enter PC connection mode.
Picture quality is a little disappointing. The frame's 320x240 pixel resolution screen is more than adequate given the screen's size, but it quickly pixelates any images of a substantial size — our 8.2-megapixel test images were almost pixelated beyond recognition. Echologic remedies this problem somewhat by offering a free piece of software on its Web site, "NorFlash Tool", which optimises photos for the device's screen. This generally works well, but there are two main drawbacks — the software is PC-only, and it will only transfer photos to the frame's internal memory rather than an SD or MMC card.
What really let this frame down are its viewing angles. Horizontal angles beyond 120 degrees caused colours to become washed out. Tilting the frame downwards doesn't reveal any flaws, but tilting upwards instantly causes the screen's contrast to be heightened, washing out colours. In real world situations, the frame will suffice when using it as a typical digital photo frame on a desk lower than eye level.
These flaws are disappointing given that the frame's colour accuracy isn't too bad. Red's are slightly under-produced, but blacks are well defined and yellows are vibrant. Flesh tones are largely accurate, making this frame a good choice for family photos and portraits.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 2 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 3 Parrot Mambo Drone review
- 4 Evapolar USB air conditioner review
- 5 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
Latest News Articles
- This disinfection robot can light the way to cleaner hospitals
- Game on: Alienware's 20-year affair with gaming helps drive the future of VR
- Microsoft opens HoloLens preorders in Australia
- Hands-on: Sony N is a Google Glass for your neck, with an assistant named Nigel
- Oculus reveals Touch VR controller pricing and launch info, US$49 Oculus Earbuds
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- TV buying guide: What to look for when buying a TV in 2016
- Best iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus plans: Optus vs Telstra vs Vodafone vs Virgin
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- FTNetwork Support SpecialistACT
- CCTest Lead with HP ALMACT
- FTSenior Application SupportSA
- FTWeb DeveloperNSW
- CCContract Management SpecialistNSW
- CCWeb DeveloperNSW
- CCContract Programmer (HTML5/Java/Oracle) 161031/P/551Asia
- FTSenior Front End DeveloperNSW
- FT.Net CRM Dynamics Developer LeadVIC
- CCIT Senior Systems Administrator- Server Patching RemediationNSW
- CCSenior Java Developer-Java SE 8, HTTP APIs, Protocol BuffersNSW
- CCSenior Test AnalystQLD
- FTHands-on Service Desk Team LeadNSW
- CCResident Operation Support Engineer (Renewable Contract)Asia
- CCNetwork Designer/ConsultantVIC
- CCDevOps EngineerNSW
- CCIT Manager - ANZNSW
- FTWeb DeveloperNSW
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (J2EE/Oracle) 161031/AP/512Asia
- CC.Net DeveloperWA
- FTGateway ManagerACT
- CCData Centre EngineerNSW
- FTSenior UX DesignerAsia
- CCSAP ERP ArchitectNSW
- CCDevOps/Automation EngineerNSW