D-Link Australia DHP-300
- Better than 802.11g performance, relatively easy to install
- The adapters are physically large and will impede adjacent outlets, configuration utility doesn't report the network speed, QoS settings are not clearly explained
If wireless coverage is poor in your dwelling, these Ethernet-over-power-line adapters might just do the trick. They're a relatively neat wired networking solution, which takes advantage of electrical wires to deliver networking connectivity anywhere an outlet is available.
Price$ 179.95 (AUD)
Sharing large files or a high-speed ADSL2+ connection over a wireless network can sometimes be a frustrating experience if the signal is too slow from the access point to the client devices. But while wireless has been touted as the best solution against messy cable installations, a better option might be an Ethernet-over-power-line adapter, especially for large dwellings. Note: we said 'might'.
D-Link's DHP-300 adapter performs the task that its name implies: it moves Ethernet data across power cables to any outlet in the house or office that's on the same power circuit. At least two adapters are required (or you can buy the DHP-301 kit, which comes with two adapters): one local adapter, which needs to be plugged into your router, and at least one remote adapter, which needs to be attached to the device you wish to connect to -- it can be another computer or a streaming device for music and video.
The DHP-300 can enable encryption for data that travels across the electrical network, while an administrator password can also be implemented to ensure that encryption can't be changed by unauthorised persons. However, the setup process is not helped by the cryptic labelling of the adapters in the configuration utility.
The remote adapter is called PLC and the local adapter is called ETH. When applying encryption and password settings, the remote adapter needs to be configured first, then the local one; there's really no way to tell which adapter is which unless you read the manual. D-Link needs to apply clearer labels to this utility to make it more user-friendly. Another quibble with the utility is that it doesn't report back on line speed.
A speed of 200Mbps is quoted for the DHP-300, but this is a theoretical figure that doesn't take into account factors such as encryption, line quality and length, as well as any other high-power devices on the electrical circuit, such as fridges and air-conditioners. Dwellings with poor wiring installations might not realise fast speeds when DHP-300 adapters are installed, and other devices that can cause the adapters to not work properly are power strips and surge protectors. However, the adapters aren't designed in a way that makes them easy to plug into a wall outlet, so a large power strip is a necessity.
We tested two DHP-300 adapters using a power strip with surge protection, and we didn't experience any problems. Using electrical outlets on the same physical circuit, we were able to transfer data from our local device to our remote one at a rate of 2.67MBps. A best-case scenario test, with both adapters plugged into the same power board, merely centimetres from each other, recorded a rate of 3.53MBps.
The rates we achieved in our test environment aren't as good as what we've achieved with a draft-n based wireless router (such as D-Link's DIR-615), but they're better than what we'd get with an 802.11g-based router. Furthermore, the results are slightly better than what we achieved with Netgear's Powerline HD Ethernet Adapters (HDXB101).
There is potential for users in dwellings with perfect wiring and line conditions to attain higher-than-wireless transfer speeds over a comparable distance, but there's no guarantee. Nevertheless, if your wireless installation is giving you grief, a couple of DHP-300 adapters might solve your problems, but won't give you the ubiquitous multi-device coverage of a wireless network. You'll have to purchase an adapter for every device that you want to connect to your network; up to 16 DHP-300 adapters can be installed on one network. Each one will consume about 39W of electricity.
Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Sony Xperia Z3 review: The no-frills flagship
- 2 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note 4 review: The busiest, biggest and best Samsung phablet
- 4 Aldi's $279 Bauhn Sphere review: Disappointing
- 5 Nokia Lumia 735 review: Perfectly ordinary
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- Reports: North Korea's Internet access, mobile networks down
- PlayStation Network recovering after outage
- Hackers target Tor as PlayStation disruption continues
- Connected, self-driving cars in the front seat at CES
- MIT unifies Web development in a single, speedy new language
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.