- Nice detailed sound, Good separation
- Mid range too dominant, Uncomfortable design
If you can handle the uncomfortable design and want a wireless pair of headphones for your portable music player, then the Creative SL3100s may be for you. Unfortunately, most people will find their ears hurt too much to really make use of them.
Price$ 199.95 (AUD)
Creative's SL3100 wireless headphones is another product in the increasingly popular Bluetooth Stereo Headphones category. It streams music wirelessly to the headphones using a rather chunky Bluetooth dongle, but unlike many other products on the market, doesn't double as a mobile phone hands-free kit.
As a pair of headphones, the primary concern is sound quality. In the past we haven't been particularly impressed by the audio quality of most Bluetooth headphones, but as this set is designed purely for pairing with a portable music player, we were hoping Creative would jump ahead of the pack. Thankfully, we were not disappointed.
The SL3100's, while not offering the best quality audio we've heard, will more than satisfy the average consumer who is looking for an alternative for their wired headphones. Their best feature is their separation and musicality. Individual elements are well placed, with reasonable detail, and the overall sound is quite fun. The mid range is the dominant part of the sound, to the point of overshadowing the highs, which are a little recessed. They also came across as quite harsh in some parts, which made listening for long periods fatiguing. The bass was quite slow, but reasonably well balanced, leaving the overall relatively neutral. The soundstage was as we expected from a mid range pair of headphones, with reasonable immersion that resembles a mid-sized concert hall.
While the sound was quite pleasing, the design leaves a little to be desired. We repeatedly encounter comfort problems with the over-the-ear style headphone. Some companies, such as Koss and Sennheiser, have got it right, employing soft rubber clips or including padding to ensure your ears don't get sore during long listening sessions. Unfortunately, Creative has included no such thing here. The ear cups themselves are padded, and relatively comfortable, however the band that holds them in place is simple, hard plastic that digs into your skin. We found the SL3100's uncomfortable after just five minutes of listening, and quickly had to remove them for a short break. No matter how good they sound, it is tough to recommend headphones that can't be worn for any real length of time. We suggest you try them on before buying, if possible, and see for yourself how they feel.
As mentioned, they pair with your audio device using a Bluetooth Dongle. This is about the size of a USB flash memory stick, and dangles from a small cable. At this size, it is a little awkward, and we much prefer the circular, coin sized dongles some other pairs of headphones have employed.
Everything is easy to operate, with pairing achieved by simply switching both devices on. There are a number of buttons on the headphones themselves, including play/pause and track skip. However, these only work with Creative MP3 players, so those with iPods and other products are out of luck.
Both units run off internal batteries, which are charged using an adapter. The battery life is quoted at eight hours, depending on usage conditions.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Star Wars Death Star Bluetooth levitating rotating speaker review
- 2 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 3 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 4 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 5 Panasonic Viera DX900U UHD 4K smart TV review
Latest News Articles
- Apple's AirPods could deliver audio with multiple wireless protocols
- First look: Nuheara IQbuds smart Bluetooth ear buds do more than just music
- Convoy International restructures business focus
- Beats Solo2 headphones go wireless for $399
- Astro A38 review: A staggering price to pay for convenience
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- CCPlatform Services EngineerNSW
- FTLevel 2 Service Desk AnalystQLD
- CCApplication Specialist (Cerner) - Brisbane BasedNSW
- CCWorkforce Planning ManagerNSW
- CCAccount Executive - SMEVIC
- FTChief Security Officer l CISSP l ISO27001NSW
- CCInfrastructure Architect - CloudVIC
- CCProject Manager - Process Transformation / AutomationVIC
- FTFront End DeveloperVIC
- CCResource/ Workforce AnalystNSW
- FTIT Business PartnerNSW
- FTSoftware DeveloperWA
- CCTechnical Application Specialist (Cerner) - Brisbane BasedOther
- FTLinux Unix AdministratorNSW
- CCMainframe Developer (with ASP.NET)SA
- FTTest AnalystVIC
- FTSAP BW ConsultantACT
- TPTechnical Specialist, Identity and Acess ManagementVIC
- TPInfrastructure Project ManagerVIC
- FTBusiness Analyst - SQLNSW
- FTWeb Developer/ DesignerSA
- FTAndroid Technical Lead (Work From Home 2-3 Days)NSW
- FTSolutions Architect - Data Centre/ NetworkQLD
- CCBusiness AnalystQLD
- TPSolution Architect | HRISQLD