Compaq Presario B1973TU
- Strong build, Portable
- Slow performance
While it's a fairly stylish notebook with a nice build, we can't help but think that you can get more for your money. If you like the design, but want a better performer, it might be worth waiting for Compaq's new Centrino models to come out.
Price$ 2,199.00 (AUD)
If high-portability is something you require of a notebook, then the Compaq Presario B1973TU will suit your needs well. Indeed, it's a lightweight notebook (1.9kg without its power supply) with a 12.1in screen, yet it has a built in optical drive. However, if you need some grunt and plenty of battery life to match the portable size, then this notebook will disappoint.
Although the stylish design and small form-factor of the B1973TU is very appealing, we're disappointed by its performance, especially considering its price ($2199 at the time of writing). Inside the tiny black and silver chassis is an Intel Core Duo T2350 1.86GHz CPU. It's a budget version of the Core Duo series, with only a 533MHz front side bus (FSB), rather than the 667MHz FSB used on other Core Duo models. This is a rare sight these days, with most vendors offering Core 2 Duo CPUs, or even the new Centrino platform (codenamed Santa Rosa), which offers some new efficiency features and a whopping 800MHz FSB, without much added cost.
The B1973TU has 1GB of DDR2 RAM, which is a fair offering, but the trend is towards a 2GB starting point for notebooks that are similarly priced. As a business machine running Windows Vista Business edition, it's no surprise that it uses a basic ATI 200M graphics chip, which is fine for everyday applications, but it won't provide fast 3-D performance. A 160GB hard drive is installed and the optical drive is a DVD re-writer with dual-layer support.
A couple of months ago, this would have been a reasonably justifiable purchase. However, with Intel's latest Centrino platform (Santa Rosa) already making an appearance in many notebooks, it's hard to justify spending the money on this one when a considerably more impressive notebook will set you back only a little more. Take the Acer TravelMate 6292 (302G16N), for example. It's 200 grams heavier than the B1973TU, costs $100 more and has up to 30 per cent better performance, which is a noteworthy advantage when using taxing applications or heavily multi-tasking.
In our WorldBench 6 benchmark, the B1973TU scored a total of 51. So far, this is the lowest score of all notebooks that have been tested with this benchmark. This isn't unexpected considering the slightly older technology that has been implemented. However, as a reflection of its price, more should be expected. That's not to say it's downright expensive, but it isn't the best value for money product available on the market. In the MP3 encoding test, where we encode 53min worth of WAV files to 192Kbps MP3 files, it took 160sec to complete the task. This, again, is a fairly slow result in comparison to similarly priced products in its category.
The Compaq Presario B1973TU's battery life isn't shocking when compared to the vast majority of products available at this price range, but it's far from ideal. As a business notebook that is plainly designed for portability, battery life should be foremost in its list of strengths, but it isn't. In our worst-case scenario battery test (a DVD rundown), the B1973TU lasted for 74min.
The test, which involves looping a DVD until the battery drains, is considerably more demanding than normal everyday usage, and this notebook will likely continue running for longer under normal conditions. Even so, users expecting to carry this around without its power supply on-hand may wish to grab an extra battery for important business presentations, or other similar situations.
The smaller size hasn't inhibited the build quality or the functionality of the notebook. The keyboard is quite comfortable to use and the touchpad is responsive. The screen itself offers a resolution of 1280x800 and is both bright and clear with good contrast levels. The viewing angle isn't perfect; it's average compared to the majority of notebooks that we've tested. We did notice a little distortion when the screen was bumped or flexed (the screen produced a ripple effect, of sorts).
This unit offers a media card reader, which has support for SD, MMC, MS and MS-Pro cards. It also offers an Express Card slot and three USB ports, as well as a mini-FireWire port, which is hidden behind a dust cover. For video output, there's a VGA port and an S-Video port. One feature that's missing from this notebook, which is rather unexpected for a business machine, is a biometric fingerprint reader. Some users may also lament the lack of a built in Web cam.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) review: Raising the bar
- 2 Xiaomi Mi4 review: Xiaomi's best yet
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note Edge review: Lightly flawed, Undeniably special
- 4 Sony Xperia Z3 review: The no-frills flagship
- 5 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- Google Now adds data from Lyft, Airbnb and many more apps
- Outlook app for Android and iOS boosts Microsoft's mobile comeback
- MIT randomizes tasks to speed massive multicore processors
- NEC aims at Big Data 'sweet spot' with new SAP Hana tool
- Uber will fight to keep its Boston ride data private
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.