Canon PowerShot A95

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 6
Canon PowerShot A95
  • Canon PowerShot A95
  • Canon PowerShot A95
  • Canon PowerShot A95

Pros

  • Nice set of features, moveable LCD, great battery life

Cons

  • Huge, heavy, blurry image edges

Bottom Line

This model has a good set of features, but it suffers from mediocre image quality and its ridiculously large size. Give it a miss unless your other interests include bodybuilding.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 6 stores)

  • Canon PS SX50HS UltraZoom 382.00
See all prices

There is something strange going on when cameras seem to get bigger as technology gets smaller. The A95 is a big camera. With batteries in, it tipped our scales at 350g, yet it only sports a 3X optical zoom and a 1.8" LCD. It's definitely not suitable for carrying in a pocket, and would likely double the weight of a small bag.

It is a pity the camera is so unwieldy, because its feature set is quite good. Offering a full range of shutter speed, focus and aperture controls, as well as a great selection of white balancing presets and a fully customisable mode, it definitely puts power in your hands. It also offers two continuous shooting modes (for taking several photos over a few seconds) to help capture an event or help you get the best shot. The only additional feature we would have liked to see is an automatic exposure bracketing feature.

A contributor to the massive size of the A95 is definitely the supported battery type. It employs four AA batteries. It comes with a set of rechargeable alkaline AAs. The upside is the A95 has great battery life. It lasted just over 600 shots in our tests, which is an incredible feat for a camera using AA batteries.

The LCD is crisp and clear. Very few cameras in this category choose to use a flip-out LCD, which can be handy to view your subject from a more comfortable angle. However, we would have expected a much larger screen than 1.8", somewhere in the range of 2.5", to help justify the size of the model.

At first glance the images taken by the camera in our tests appeared to be very good. The middle was clear, bright and the colours were rich and not too faded. As we moved towards the outside of the picture, however, things began to blur. This was not such a problem on simple subjects, but objects like foliage and other areas of detail suffered quite badly around the edge of the pictures.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the Good Gear Guide comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?