Canon PowerShot A480
A cheap digital camera that looks and feels shocking but offers good value.
- Crisp and well-coloured photos considering its price
- Poor viewing angles on LCD screen, awkward design, some overexposure problems, noticeable chromatic aberration
The physical appearance and design of the PowerShot A480 aren't great, but it does have the potential to take some good-looking shots. It's perhaps one of the best point-and-shoot digital still cameras in the sub-$200 price range. Give it a go if you're a beginner looking for something inexpensive.
Price$ 179.00 (AUD)
It's very hard to like the Canon PowerShot A480 digital camera, because it simply looks and feels awful. The controls are laid out awkwardly on a body that is cramped yet bulky. Its LCD screen has very poor viewing angles and brightness, which can make it hard to frame your shots properly on bright days and when you want to take angled shots from low down or high up. But there is no doubting that the Canon PowerShot A480 can produce impressively crisp and vibrant photos considering its low, low asking price of $179.
It's equipped with Canon's DIG!C III processor and has a 10-megapixel sensor. It was able to capture natural colour tones and it produced relatively crisp pictures, but it did have some trouble properly exposing brightly lit photos. Indeed, it won't produce image quality as good as a more expensive Canon compact camera, but you would be hard pressed finding a camera in the same price range capable of capturing better pictures.
Outdoor shots in bright sunlight — taken in auto mode, as well as using the appropriate scene modes — suffered from overly exposed highlights. Even though the camera has a shutter that can close in 1/2000th of a second, most of our overexposed test shots didn't use anything above 1/640th of a second in bright sunlight. Conversely, most of our indoor shots were exposed much better and were not overly dark. The camera doesn't have image stabilisation technology, but handheld shots taken at around 1/50th of a second were clear. The camera's only anti-shake tactic is to boost the ISO speed when it's taking photos in dark areas.
Noise wasn't noticeable in our tests shots until ISO 400, but chromatic aberration was visible in high-contrast areas; it was at its worst when black met white. Lens distortion was barely noticeable in our test shots, but considering the relatively short range of the 3.2x optical zoom lens (37-122mm), we didn't expect to see any barrel roll at all.
Because it's a camera aimed at beginners and bargain hunters, you won't find a dedicated manual mode. Instead there is a program mode, which lets you adjust ISO sensitivity, exposure compensation, white balance and focus mode (evaluative, centre and spot). You can't change the aperture and shutter values yourself; the camera handles these values itself in auto mode and in its 12 scene modes.
One thing that the Canon PowerShot A480 does well is capture clear and wonderfully blurred super macro shots. You can get up to within 1cm of your subject, which means you can snap some creative flower shots, and even close-up insect shots if you dare.
For the most part, the Canon PowerShot A480 will take shots that are clear and well-coloured, even when scrutinised at their maximum size (3648x2736 — although they will look a little feathered at this resolution). This means you should be able to get good-looking prints at up to A4 size, if not bigger.
Like most point-and-shoot digital cameras, the Canon PowerShot A480 has face detection. In some digital cameras you can use this feature to track all sorts of objects, but in this Canon camera face detection will only work if it recognises the shape of a face. It tracked faces accurately from left to right and up and down, but lost them when our test subjects turned their heads. Likewise, it couldn't recognise faces when our test subjects wore hats.
The Canon PowerShot A480 is made of plastic and feels a little flimsy. It has a slight wedge shape, getting thicker from left to right in order to accommodate the AA battery compartment. It's an uncomfortable camera to hold, as it doesn't have a dedicated area for you to put your right thumb when you shoot, so you either have to rest it on the screen or on the playback button. In fact, that's probably one of the reasons Canon has placed this button almost flush with the body, and therefore made it hard to press. The zoom buttons, too, are awkward to press. The Canon PowerShot A480 also suffers from some shutter lag.
While we hate the appearance and design of the PowerShot A480, it does have the potential to take some good-looking shots, and it's perhaps one of the best point-and-shoot digital cameras in the sub-$200 price range. Give it a go if you're a beginner looking for something inexpensive.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Fetch TV Mighty review: Better than Foxtel
- 2 Fetch TV Mini review: Make your TV a smart TV
- 3 Parrot Mambo Drone review
- 4 Evapolar USB air conditioner review
- 5 Hisense Series 7 ULED 4K UHD TV review
Latest News Articles
- Boom: SanDisk just dropped the world's largest SD card
- Camera app makers tap into RAW power with iOS, and look forward to dual lenses
- Google Camera 3.2 lets you snap pictures while recording video
- CES 2016: Top 10 trends
- Sony α7S II aimed film-makers and low light photographers
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: The new best Android phone
- TV buying guide: What to look for when buying a TV in 2016
- Best iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus plans: Optus vs Telstra vs Vodafone vs Virgin
- Which flagship TV is best? Sony 4K HDR Bravia 2016 versus LG 4K HDR OLED 2016
- 10 Blu-ray movies / Best looking Blu-ray movies
- FTWeb Business AnalystQLD
- TPChange Manager | GovernmentQLD
- FTProject Lead / Business Analyst | SalesforceQLD
- CCBusiness AnalystACT
- FTLua DeveloperVIC
- TPProject Manager. AutomationNSW
- CCSAP ERP ArchitectNSW
- TPProject Coordinator - IT projectsVIC
- CCSenior Business Analyst - experience in IDAM a MUSTNSW
- FTAX Functional ConsultantNSW
- CCFront End DeveloperNSW
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (Windows Server) 161031/AP/962Asia
- FTSenior CISCO Network EngineerQLD
- CCProject SchedulerVIC
- FTSenior Analyst ProgrammerNSW
- CCGraduate Web DeveloperWA
- CCAX Functional SupportQLD
- CCBase24 DeveloperNSW
- TPHelpdesk/Level 1 SupportQLD
- FTSalesforce Subject Matter ExpertNSW
- FTDevOps EngineerNSW
- CCSAP GRC ConsultantACT
- FTSenior Full Stack DeveloperNSW
- CCInfrastructure Specialist :SCOMWA
- CCBackup ConsultantWA