Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100
- Consistent colour, better images
- Profiles don't match the names of the papers that Canon sells
The imagePROGRAF iPF6100 should put an end to talk that Canon can't compete in the professional photo printer market. With a better ink formulation and an improved printhead, this 12-ink printer produces excellent images on both glossy and fine-art media. Canon needs to clean up its profile management, but overall, the iPF6100 is a very good printer that fits in well in a competitive market.
Price$ 5,445.00 (AUD)
Best Deals (Selling at 1 store)
- Genuine Pfi-102bk Black Ink->ipf500/ipf510/ipf6... 118.00
Consistent colour, better images
Last year, when we looked at Canon's first professional-level 17in printer, the imagePROGRAF iPF5000, we felt that its prints were not as sharp and true as those printed on the top-level Epson printers, such as the Stylus Pro 4800. This was largely an issue with the profiles that Canon shipped with the printer. You needed to tweak them, or create your own profiles, to get the best possible prints, but there were still some issues, such as bronzing, that caused some people to dismiss the iPF5000.
Since that time, Canon has been hard at work. The company says that it has improved a number of problem areas in the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100 print engine, and all of those tweaks have been designed to improve print quality. For example, the black and grey inks have been reformulated to provide better coverage and scratch resistance; the print head has been redesigned, producing a tiny 4-picoliter droplet; and improved screening routines resolve detail much more finely than the iPF5000's printhead.
This all means significantly improved print quality. Last year, iPF5000 prints regularly came in at the bottom in our jury testing, but this year, prints from the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100 often tied or beat prints from the top Epson and HP printers. Colour fidelity was excellent, and fine detail, especially in the shadows, was reproduced exceptionally well. Black-and-white images were neutral, and looked good on every paper type we printed them on.
Going beyond the quality of the photos, the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100's print speed is quite good as well. Using the mid-level quality setting, which was more than adequate for most images, the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100 printed an 8x10in image in 1 minute, 30 seconds; a 16x20in image took 3 minutes, 36 seconds; and a 24in square photograph took 5 minutes, 36 seconds to print. (In contrast, the 24in square image took 7 minutes, 57 seconds to print with comparable quality on similar paper on our HP Designjet Z3100 Photo.)
While the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100 makes some significant strides over previous Canon printers, there is still room for improvement. The biggest issue is that many of the iPF6100's ICC profiles don't match the names of the papers that Canon sells, which means that you have to guess which paper goes with which profile. For example, the roll of Heavyweight Satin Photographic Paper sent to us by Canon was listed in the printer's settings when we loaded it, but not in the print driver. Instead, there were three different types of semi-gloss photo papers to choose from, and we had to print sample images with each profile to figure out which one came out closest to our image, and then put a note on our monitor to remember which profile was for which paper.
In addition, the documentation, while much better than that of the iPF5000, could still be better organised and presented. There are also a few places where the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100's plastics feel flimsy and cheap, which is something we hate to see in a printer of this class.
Fitting into the market
In the wide-format market, the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100 is up against Epson's Stylus Pro 7800 -- whose replacement, the 7880 is just starting to ship -- and HP's Designjet Z2100 Photo and Z3100 Photo printers. The Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100's print quality and speed are comparable to all of these printers, although Epson says that the 7880 has a wider colour gamut than its competitors (we haven't yet tested this model). With the Epson printers, however, you have to physically swap the photo and matte black inks when you want to change paper types.
HP's Designjets, while more expensive than the Canon imagePROGRAF iPF6100, produce stunning images and have a much stronger set of features, including integrated profiling, thanks to their built-in X-Rite i1 colorimeters. In this quickly changing market, you can get a printer from Canon, Epson or HP that will produce excellent, long-lasting prints.
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) review: Raising the bar
- 2 Xiaomi Mi4 review: Xiaomi's best yet
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note Edge review: Lightly flawed, Undeniably special
- 4 Sony Xperia Z3 review: The no-frills flagship
- 5 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- Office for Android now widely available, with new Outlook apps in tow
- AllSeen IoT group acts to head off patent wars
- The Upload: Your tech news briefing for Thursday, January 29
- Intel wants to banish cables, connectors with new Broadwell chips
- Apple hits Samsung at home, where it hurts
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.