Canon HF200 HD camcorder
Canon's Legria HF200 is a flash memory-based high-definition camcorder
- 8GB SD card included in sales package, reasonable price, external microphone jack
- Low-light performance isn't impressive, didn't deliver the leap in video quality we were hoping for
The Canon Legria HF200 is a solid HD camcorder that boasts some useful, no-nonsense features. While there are better camcorders on the market, it does a great job for the asking price.
Price$ 1,399.00 (AUD)
The Canon Legria HF200 is a midrange high-definition camcorder for videographers on a budget. It records AVCHD video to SD/SDHC memory cards, which is swiftly becoming the dominant video format in the consumer market.
While it’s not the best HD video camera we’ve seen, the Canon Legria HF200 provides good image quality and a decent set of features for the asking price. Serious users will be especially impressed by the inclusion of an external microphone jack; something that most midrange units lack. Otherwise, there is nothing particularly noteworthy about the Canon Legria HF200 — it does its job well and keeps the gimmicks to a minimum.
So why removable flash memory? We’ve reeled off the benefits of flash memory–based camcorders many times in the past, but in a nutshell: they’re quieter, smaller and more energy efficient than all other video formats — including HDD. It’s no coincidence that most vendors are phasing out their hard disk–based models in favour of flash memory. (Canon currently offers 12 flash memory camcorders, compared to precisely zero HDD models — the writing’s on the wall.)
The Canon Legria HF200 can be viewed as a more affordable alternative to the Canon HF20. It lacks the HF20’s 32GB inbuilt memory, which means you’re forced to use the SD card slot at all times (an 8GB SD card is included in the sales package). Otherwise, the Canon HF200 is virtually identical to its big brother — even the dimensions are the same. Highlights include a 15x optical zoom lens, a 3.31-megapixel 1/4in CMOS sensor, Full HD 1080p recording, a maximum AVCHD bit rate of 24 megabits per second (24Mbps) and the afore-mentioned 3.1mm microphone jack.
If you’re serious about video, the inclusion of external audio is not to be underestimated; most sub-$1500 camcorders remove this output as a matter of course. The benefits of a 24Mbps bit rate are considerably less obvious, though we suppose it’s good to have the ‘best’ — even if the difference is barely perceptible.
Compared to Canon’s high-end offerings, the HF20 didn’t exactly knock our socks off and the Legria HF200 is in the same unfortunate boat. While there’s nothing especially wrong with its video performance, it lacks the marked leap in quality we have come to expect from each new generation. In fact, when compared to 2008’s Canon HF11, it could be argued that the HF200 has actually taken a turn for the worse. For one thing, the Canon HF11 had a larger 1/3in CMOS sensor that did a good job of combating noise. The Legria HF200 seemed to have a tougher time in our low-light tests, with grainy footage ruling the day.
But we’re being a bit unfair here. When compared to almost any non-Canon camcorder on the market, the Legria HF200 acquits itself incredibly well. Colours were rich and vibrant; especially in optimum lighting, while images remained consistently sharp throughout testing. With a Full HD resolution of 1080p, the Canon Legria HF200 is tailor-made for playback on HDTV. We previewed our footage on a and didn’t notice any obvious aberrations. Provided you stick to natural daylight, the Legria HF200 will rival almost anything on the market.
Canon has also seen fit to include a stills mode, but at 3 megapixels, its output is barely suitable for regular-sized prints. If you’re looking for a hybrid device, you’ll need to plum for something a little more expensive, such as the 10-megapixel Sony HDR-SR12E . (For what it’s worth, the auto mode did a good job of keeping things focused and properly exposed.)
The Canon Legria HF200 comes with a reasonable array of options for hands-on users. Shutter speed, exposure and aperture (from f/1.8 to f/8.0) can all be adjusted manually. For menu navigation, Canon has doggedly stuck to a miniature joystick; located on the outer lip of the LCD. We feel it’s only a matter of time before Canon succumbs to the lure of the touch screen, so if you prefer a traditional interface — get it while you still can!
Follow GoodGearGuide on Twitter: @GoodGearGuide
Join the Good Gear Guide newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) review: Raising the bar
- 2 Xiaomi Mi4 review: Xiaomi's best yet
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Note Edge review: Lightly flawed, Undeniably special
- 4 Sony Xperia Z3 review: The no-frills flagship
- 5 Samsung's Galaxy Alpha review: A peek into the Galaxy S6
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- NIST pledges transparency in NSA dealings over crypto standards
- North Carolina could be next in Google Fiber roll-out
- Conference calls a waste of time? In 1915, this one made history
- Box rides high on Wall Street’s warm welcome
- China tightens Internet control by blocking VPN services
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.